Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
General Administration

Single window for planning permits sought

Print PDF

The Hindu             04.02.2014

Single window for planning permits sought

K. Manikandan

Builders say delays plague process of issuing planning permissions for property

Taking a cue from other metropolitan cities in the South, the State government should consider creating a ‘single window counter’ to issue planning permissions for properties in the city, builders have suggested.

A section of Chennai builders submitted their grievances to Housing Minister R. Vaithilingam recently. Their demands include doing away with the practice of getting No Objection Certificates from multiple government agencies, and instead, setting up a single location or agency.

Members of Builders Association of India (BAI) and Confederation of Real Estate Developers’ Associations of India (CREDAI) have been vocal about the delay in receiving the planning permission. The delays along with red-tapism and the high cost of construction material are affecting them, they say.

“The single window counter is a success in Pune. Even Bangalore and Hyderabad have dynamic systems of approvals,” pointed out Sandeep Mehta of CREDAI’s Chennai Chapter. He said the practice of getting NOC from the traffic police, for instance, should be done away with as builders incorporate provisions of Development Control Rules relating to parking.

Ram Prabhu of BAI, said that in the rest of the State capitals in South India, the time taken to issue plan approval was not more than two months, while Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority took as long as two years in certain cases.

A CMDA official said a couple of years ago, the pending applications stood at more than 500 but at present, the number had come down to 250. Of these, less than 50 projects were special buildings (residential/commercial building with more than two floors but less than four floors, or a residential building with more than six dwelling units) and multi-storey buildings (more than 4 floors).

Officials said they had issued planning permissions to 549 special buildings in 2012 (528 in 2013) and 88 multi storey buildings in 2012 (75 in 2013). Some of the approvals were issued in less than two months and CMDA’s transparency was for all to see, the official added.

The number of plan approvals given by them amounted to less than 10 per cent of the total permissions issued by local bodies, including Chennai Corporation, in the Chennai Metropolitan Area. Any delays, if at all, were due to erratic applications or non-payment of the stipulated charges, he added.

 

Illegal hoardings: printers’ licences to be cancelled

Print PDF

The Hindu             04.02.2014

Illegal hoardings: printers’ licences to be cancelled

Aloyisus Xavier Lopez

Chennai Corporation has decided to cancel trade licences of printers who help erect illegal hoardings in the city. Chennai Corporation and the district collectorate have scaled up operations against hoardings and digital banners across the city over the past month.

“As many as 2099 illegal hoardings and banners have been removed in the past one month. But we have been unable to control illegal hoardings. All officials of the 15 zones have been instructed to initiate measures to cancel trade licences of printers. The premises of the printers of illegal banners will be sealed,” said an official of Chennai Corporation.

The drive on Monday was intensified on Anna Salai, Walajah Road, Ritchie Street, Dams Road and Poonamallee High Road. However, action against printers was not initiated in most of the zones. At a meeting on Monday, officials from the taluk monitoring committee informed the Coordination Committee on Hoardings and Digital Banners that more than 2099 hoardings had been removed in the city in 2014.

The coordination committee also stressed the need for filing criminal cases against those responsible for erecting illegal digital banners and hoardings. “Banners of MDMK were removed in some parts of the city. Private agencies have also been warned,” said an official.

Most banners carry advertisements of private enterprises, including those of cinemas, food products, motor vehicles and jewellers. The Madras High Court has already directed the district administration to remove all illegal hoardings, digital banners and take the necessary action against those violating the law.

 

'Sharpen the teeth of law to combat stray cattle menace'

Print PDF

The New Indian Express             03.02.2014 

'Sharpen the teeth of law to combat stray cattle menace'

A cattle shelter in Pudupet that houses stray cattle in the Southern part of the city | P RAVIKUMAR
A cattle shelter in Pudupet that houses stray cattle in the Southern part of the city | P RAVIKUMAR

The Corporation of Chennai recently inducted a fleet of vehicles with hydraulic lift for catching and clearing stray cattle from the roads of the city in a humane way. However, activists feel that the only way to fight the problem of stray cattle is increasing the penalty on the owners.

At present, the Corporation operates two shelters in the city for stray cattle.

 “The vehicles operate in different areas of the city and the cattle caught in the Southern areas are taken to the Pudupet shelter, while those from the North are lodged in Perambur,” explains an official from the Corporation’s Veterinary Department.

However, while the vehicles do a successful job in keeping the cattle off the roads, the owners get off easily with a fine of ` 1,550 per cattle.

Dawn Williams of the Blue Cross of India says that the callous attitude of the owners is a result of the lack of proper deterrence measures.

He says, “Even when a cattle is caught or rescued after it has suffered injuries on the road, the owner collects the cow after paying the nominal fee of `1,550 and again leaves the cow on the street. In worst cases, if the cow is severely injured, he sells it to the slaughter house.”

While the Corporation has employed humane hydraulic vehicles to lift the cattle from the roads without the use of leash, the owners, after reclaiming them use the leash again to take the cattle back home, adds Williams.

The Blue Cross treats at least two cows every day, after they meet with accidents. The teams currently available can only save around 15 to 20 cows out of every 50 cattle rescued.

However, according to Williams, the cattle that are saved stand to suffer as several butchers stand in line to claim the cattle as theirs. Williams has devised a way to deter this.

He adds that the onus of the action should be on the owners and they should be made to face the heat.

He says, “I get an FIR  registered with the police about every cattle that I rescue. If any butcher or even the real owner comes to claim the cattle, he is slapped with a case under IPC 289 for failure to provide food and shelter to an animal he owns.”

Another animal activist S Srinath says, “The authorities have taken measures to curb the menace, but the approach is wrong. It is not the cattle’s mistake that it is on the road; it is the fault of the owners that they left it there. One warning is understandable, but if the same cattle owner is found to be responsible for the second time then the cattle should be confiscated and given to Blue Cross.”

Last Updated on Monday, 03 February 2014 08:36
 


Page 20 of 143