Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Urban Encroachment

Plea to remove unauthorised shops

Print PDF

The Hindu                        13.03.2013

Plea to remove unauthorised shops

Staff Reporter 

The Coimbatore Corporation has been asked to remove shops in the new fish market in Ukkadam that sell items that are not permitted.

According to a section of the shopkeepers, after Anshul Mishra, a former Commissioner, initiated action by sealing a shop, nothing much was done to check sale of items that were not permitted to be sold. Thereafter a shopkeeper moved the Madras High Court, which ordered the Corporation to allow only those shops that sold items that were in the list provided by the Corporation.

 

Corporation promises to clear pavement shops in city

Print PDF

The New Indian Express                       08.03.2013

Corporation promises to clear pavement shops in city

“In view of the statement, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Corporation to comply with the said submission in accordance with law within four months,” the bench said.|PTI

“In view of the statement, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Corporation to comply with the said submission in accordance with law within four months,” the bench said.|PTI.

Steps have been taken to remove all temporary shops on pavements, the Chennai Corporation informed Madras High Court on Thursday.

In a counter filed before the first bench, comprising Acting Chief Justice R K Agrawal and Justice N Paul Vasanthakumar, in response to a public interest writ petition from activist ‘Traffic’ K R Ramaswamy, the Corporation said differently-abled people had also been instructed to remove their shops by their own arrangements, failing which, the Corporation would take action. This operation would take at least four months, the Corporation said.

“In view of the statement, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Corporation to comply with the said submission in accordance with law within four months,” the bench said.

The counter said following the directions of the High Court on earlier occasions, the Corporation had constituted a committee, based on whose recommendations, the Corporation Commissioner had held that bunk shops were permanent encroachments in public places, which hindered the movement of public and traffic.

Therefore, it could not be permitted at the present locations. The Commissioner had also said preference would be given to bunk shop owners when the corporation allocates shops.

He said during the action process, they would be permitted to participate for a maximum of three times without a security deposit, other conditions remaining the same. The differently-abled bunk shop owners could avail reservations in getting allotment as per the existing rules in force, the Commissioner added.

Last Updated on Saturday, 09 March 2013 04:43
 

HC directs Corporation to remove unauthorised bunk shops

Print PDF

The Hindu                         08.03.2013

HC directs Corporation to remove unauthorised bunk shops

Special Correspondent 

The Madras High Court on Thursday directed the Chennai Corporation to remove unauthorised bunk shops within four months.

The First Bench, comprising Acting Chief Justice V.K. Agrawal and Justice N. Paul Vasanthakumar, passed the order while disposing of a writ petition.

Earlier, passing an interim order on a petition by K.R. Ramaswamy alias ‘Traffic’ Ramaswamy, the court had directed the corporation to file an affidavit on Thursday on the time required to remove such bunk shops. It had also directed the corporation to submit a report regarding the action taken till date after the bunk shop committee proceedings wherein the Commissioner had instructed all zonal officers to enumerate the bunk shops in their jurisdiction.

In an affidavit, the corporation Commissioner, Vikram Kapur, said the civic body was “taking action to remove the unauthorised bunk shops after ascertaining the list of bunk shops located in zones.” Hence, it needed time. It had already started implementing court orders. The differently-abled had been instructed to remove their shops on their own, failing which the corporation would take action. This operation would take a minimum of four months for completion.

Earlier, following court orders, based on the committee’s recommendations, the Commissioner had passed an order that bunk stalls were permanent encroachments on footpaths, roads and other public places, which were a hindrance to public and traffic. They may be given preference in the allocation of corporation shops when they were being auctioned for allotment by permitting them to participate in auctions (maximum three times) without any security deposit and other conditions being the same. The differently abled bunk shop owners could avail themselves of reservation in getting allotment.

 


Page 20 of 54