Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
General Administration

Top Maharashtra politicians get BMC notices

Print PDF

The Times of India               19.04.2013

Top Maharashtra politicians get BMC notices

MUMBAI: The BMC has cracked down on the who's who of state politics, from deputy chief minister and irrigation minister Ajit Pawar to deputy leader of BJP in the Lok Sabha Gopinath Munde, for making illegal alterations and user conversion in their Worli housing society.

The BMC, in a first, has issued notices under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act (MRTP) to 10 politicians who own properties in Shubhada and Sukhada co-op housing societies in Worli for converting convenience stores into offices and even gymnasiums.

The 10 are: Pawar, Munde, Maharashtra's relief and rehabilitation, and forest minister Patangrao Kadam, food and civil supplies minister Anil Deshmukh, his son Salil Deshmukh, former Union home minister and now governor of Punjab Shivraj Patil, state Congress chief Manikrao Thakare, NCP vice-president Anna Dange, former minister of state Pratap Singh Mohite Patil, former state Congress chief Ranjit Deshmukh (who is also the chairman of Shubhada society). Copies of the notices have been marked to the secretaries of the societies.

TOI had reported on April 4 that the BMC first issued notices on the matter to the secretaries on January 28 after it received a complaint from RTI activist Amit Maru. The latest set of notices was issued on April 12.

Except Patangrao Kadam, all got the notices for alterations on the ground floor of Shubhada. Kadam got one notice for amalgamating three shops in Sukhada into a gymnasium. Pawar received two notices. One is for his firm, Non-Con Energies, converting shops 10 and 11 in Shubhada into a gymnasium and the other is for converting shop 6 into an office. Munde got one notice for his firm NV Distilleries for combining a shop and a basement room into an office.

Shubhada chairman Deshmukh, despite himself receiving a notice for an alteration, told TOI, "We had informed all members of the society that there were no BMC permissions for offices or gymnasiums, but only for convenience stores. Yet, Munde constructed an office right down to the basement. We told them to take permission and submit plans, yet they went ahead."

When asked pointedly about his own notice, he evaded a direct answer and said he had told "the BMC to remove any unauthorised alterations".

Munde's spokesperson Ameet Satam (a BJP corporator) said, "We will discuss with our lawyers and architects and try and get this regularized as per the rule book."

But why was the rule book not followed to begin with? Satam said, "I need to check if this was brought to our notice right at the start. We can apply for change-of-user now." Dange said, "We have not done any unauthorised constructions without the BMC's permission. The society made the alterations and gave it to us."

Pawar and the others could not be contacted.

An official from the BMC's building proposal department said, the notices were given for work beyond the approved plan. "We will take action as per the MRTP Act if the politicians do not make the necessary alterations. They need to spend their money to do this."

IPS officer-turned-lawyer YP Singh said, "This is the first time such big names have been exposed by the BMC. It will be tough this time for the BMC to sit on the notices due to better public awareness. It is shameful that such upholders of law have blatantly indulged in criminal offences. What moral authority they have to take action against illegal constructions which have been killing people when they themselves are thick into it? This should be an exemplary case which will not get diluted under any circumstances."

The BMC has taken the first step in its declared crackdown on illegal additions and alterations. But it must follow up these notices with tough action on the ground, which will scare other violators. This is not only about implementation of rules. It also has to do with the safety of those who stay in buildings that have seen major changes, which can lead to serious structural damage.
Last Updated on Friday, 19 April 2013 12:04
 

Illegal parking fee collection causing losses to Guwahati Municipal Corporation

Print PDF

The Times of India               19.04.2013

Illegal parking fee collection causing losses to Guwahati Municipal Corporation

GUWAHATI: The illegal collection of parking fee from various roadside parking lots under the Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) since April 1 has caused the GMC exchequer a loss of several thousands of rupees.

Though the roadside parking lots in the city are under the GMC, the corporation had leased 40 of these parking lots last year. But even after completion of the one-year term on March 31, lessees are charging parking fee at various parking lots.

"After completion of the one-year lease, the lessees should have stopped collecting the fee, which was instead to be collected by the GMC from April 1. However, the lessees are still collecting parking fee illegally," said a GMC official.

During the Rongali Bihu season, people in large numbers visited the city and the lessees could, therefore, collect a good amount of money. The lessees were able to make a huge profit only due to the laziness of the enforcement officials of the GMC.

An enforcement official of the GMC said they are searching for the lessees, who are collecting parking fee illegally since April 1. After TOI apprised the GMC about the illegal collection of parking fee, GMC authorities assured to take a tough stand on the matter. Additional commissioner of the GMC, Mukul Gogoi told TOI that the GMC will issue an order asking the lessees to hand over the money collected as parking fee from the public since April 1. Gogoi said the GMC is going to reorganize the parking areas in the city.

"We want to bring down the number of parking lots in the city so that the lessees can be made more accountable. The process to hand over 35 parking lots in the city to lessees is on," he added.
Last Updated on Friday, 19 April 2013 11:40
 

Boards along river to warn polluters of penal action

Print PDF

The Times of India               19.04.2013

Boards along river to warn polluters of penal action

NASHIK: The Bombay high court on Thursday asked the Nashik Municipal Corporation (NMC) to put up boards along the Godavari river to warn people that those polluting the river would face penal action in the form of imprisonment or fine.

The high court had, in the past, directed the civic body to erect warning boards declaring the water in the river to be unfit for drinking.

The Bombay high court directed Godavari Gatarikaran Virodhi Manch, the non-governmental organisation (NGO) that had filed a public interest litigation (PIL) against government officials for the river pollution, to send a notice to the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) to be present on May 6 for the next hearing.

NEERI has been officially appointed by the court to give solutions on Maharashtra Pollution Control Board's (MPCB) suggestions to the municipal body to control pollution.

The court also asked the MPCB to list all the problems associated with the river and its expectations from the civic body and had it over to NEERI so that it could provide relevant solutions.

The MPCB's expectations from the civic body include maintaining the quality and the wholesomeness of the river water, proper drainage system, to have continuous flow of the river, etc. When the MPCB pointed out that the municipal body had started collecting the pooja material from the river with the help of boats, the court directed the NMC to adopt alternate measures to clean the river.

"From our point of view, the quality of water should be as per the specifications. The Godavari river comes under class II category, according to which, the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in the river should not exceed 5mg/litre and dissolved oxygen (DO) should not be less than 4 mg /litre. The NEERI has to suggest measures that need to be taken to maintain the quality of water in the river," one of the petitioners, Rajesh Pandit said.

The court also asked the civic body to put up boards by the riverside warning that penal action (imprisonment or fine) would be taken against those polluting the river.

The PIL was heard by justices Abhay Oke and Mrudula Bhatkar. Pravarthak Pathak appeared on behalf of the petitioners, Abhinandan Waghyani on behalf of the state government, M L Patil on behalf of the civic body and Rajendra Raghuvanshi on behalf of the MPCB. Representatives of the government offices, the NGO and DCP Sahebrao Patil were present during the hearing. The next hearing is scheduled for May 6.
Last Updated on Friday, 19 April 2013 11:23
 


Page 512 of 686