Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
General Administration

BBMP move skirts tender process

Print PDF

The Hindu        22.03.2011

BBMP move skirts tender process

Chitra V. Ramani

The Mayor and the Deputy Mayor's discretionary funds, totalling a whopping Rs. 175 crore a year, can now be used without the mandatory tendering process.

The Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike's (BBMP) request for 4 (g) exemption under the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act 1999 was approved by the Finance Department on March 10, according to a letter issued by the Urban Development Department on March 11.

It was during the 2010-11 budget that the Mayor's grants went up from Rs. 20 crore to a staggering Rs. 150 crore. For the first time, the Deputy Mayor got a fund of Rs. 25 crore.

Raised eyebrows

Henceforth, works taken up under the Mayor and Deputy Mayor's discretionary funds may be handed over to the Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Ltd. (KRIDL), a government agency, without going through the tender process.

This has raised the eyebrows of a section of BBMP's officials.Under the law, 4(g) exemption is applicable for emergency works and those taken up during natural calamities or construction of schools, colleges, anganwadi buildings, hostel rooms, housing for the economically weaker sections of society, primary health centres, rural water supply and sanitation work.

Under the Act, a project can be scheduled and approved without tender process “during the period of natural calamity” and/or “as mentioned by the State Government from time to time.”

Overspending?

However, officials said that this move may lead to the BBMP coughing up much more for the projects even though KRIDL is a government agency.

“If there is tender process, the works could be handed over to the contractor who quotes the least. However, as this process may be bypassed, vested interests may try to inflate the actual project cost and pocket the remaining funds,” the official alleged.

Mayor S.K. Nataraj justified the move saying KRIDL could execute “piece works”. “The funds are being utilised for various works, including laying of roads, construction of culverts and strengthening of storm-water drains,” he said.

Even if KRIDL is to take up work, it has to be as per norms. If the work is being subcontracted, then it is bound by the transparency Act, the officials said.

The BBMP Council earlier saw heated debate on the quality of work, especially filling of potholes, executed by KRIDL.

The Council then decided not to hand over any work to KRIDL, only to change its mind later.


  • Mayor, Deputy free to spend Rs. 175 crore
  • It has raised the eyebrows of a section of officials
  •  

    Construction waste dumping goes on unabated in Ullal

    Print PDF

    The Hindu     11.03.2011

    Construction waste dumping goes on unabated in Ullal

    Raghava M.

    The Coastal Regulatory Zone bans dumping of construction waste within 500 metres

    A MOCKERY OF WARNING: Garbage being dumped right under the notice board put up by the Ullal Town Panchayat. — Photo: R. Eswarraj
    A MOCKERY OF WARNING: Garbage being dumped right under the notice board put up by the Ullal Town Panchayat. — Photo: R. Eswarraj

    Ullal Town Panchayat has displayed two sign boards on the road near the Ullal beach asking people not to dump waste on the 100-metre road stretch. While the words on the first board are almost blurred, the other board at the end of the road stretch is crumbling. Between these two boards, there are heaps of debris indicating that the boards have hardly served the purpose while the officials said they could not do much other than filing a complaint with the police.

    The place where the waste was being dumped was within 500 metres from high tide line, said Chief Officer of the Ullal Town Municipal Council B.C. Sadananda. The Coastal Regulatory Zone bans dumping of construction waste within 500 meters. “The material is dumped at night and it's difficult to prevent it,” Mr. Sadananda said. Nagappa, an elderly fisherman, who lives near the site, said dumping of waste had continued unabated. “Dumping of construction waste has continued for several years. Nothing has changed despite representations to the panchayat,” he said.

    Umavathi, a representative of the Meenugara Mahila Hitarakshana Samiti, said a majority of the construction waste that was dumped was from neighbouring areas. The dumping of waste had caused problems, including defacing the road. “The only relief is that kitchen waste from houses is not dumped here. If dumped, the municipality regularly clears it,” she said.

    Mr. Sadananda said the construction waste came from neighbouring places such as Someshwara and Kotekar which did not have dumping yards. “We also do not have places where the dumped material can be moved,” he said. Mr. Sadananda said the Council had only filed complaints with the police. The Council was yet to decide on engaging personnel to watch the dumping activity and take action, he aid. Rohini, a fisherwoman, complained about the hazards faced because of the discharge of effluents from some of the fishmeal and fish oil industries located off the beach. “You cannot stand even for a minute at this spot. Those engaged in drying fish on the beach are more prone to infections,” she said.

    The team from The Hindu visited the spot and found indications of effluent from two industrial units entering the sea.

    Mr. Sadananada said work was on to construct three effluent treatment plants near the industries which would be functional in six months. “The industries then have to pass the effluents through the plants,” he said.

     

    Civic body officials check AC market

    Print PDF

    The Times of India         10.03.2011

    Civic body officials check AC market


    LUDHIANA: After the Punjab and Haryana High Court directions, the municipal corporation commissioner, along with municipal town planner and fire brigade team, visited AC market in Bhadhaur house on Wednesday.

    The inspection was conducted on the HC directions, as the authorities had reportedly informed it that ''encroachments in the market have been removed completely''.

    A public interest litigation was filed in the high court against the shifting of parking lot from basement to terrace of the building. It was filed by Satish Kumar, a shopkeeper in the market. He alleged that owner of market and president of Caliber Plaza Shopkeepers' Association Mann Singh was ''making commercial use of parking lot''. He also alleged that construction of 625 shops was allotted in the market, but there were 750 shops and 54 were constructed in basement alone, which was not allowed.

    On Wednesday, a team of MC officials checked the market and fire-safety arrangements and lifts there. Satish, a resident of Krishna Nagar near Ghumar Mandi, said last hearing of the case was on February 22, when the commissioner had informed the court that they had removed encroachments. But the HC had directed him to visit market and present a report in court by March 28, he added.

    Another PIL was filed in the court by a shopkeeper, Shamsher Singh Channi, when a portion of his shop was razed for ''violation of building by-laws''. Mann Singh, however, said the allegations levelled by a few shopkeepers against him were ''baseless and there was no violation in market''. He said the corporation authorities have conducted checking and they were satisfied with arrangements.

    In the meanwhile, the commissioner was apprised of the problems of shopkeepers in the market. He has directed the officers to remove materials kept outside shops, so that passage was not obstructed.

    Meanwhile, MC commissioner AK Sinha said, 'I have carried out checking in the market and fire brigade officials have been directed to examine fire safety arrangements. They will submit a report after which I will take a decision.' 

     


    Page 584 of 686