Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
General Administration

Municipality to Speed up Bus Terminal Project

Print PDF

The New Indian Express               23.12.2013

Municipality to Speed up Bus Terminal Project

The Tripunithura Municipality has initiated steps to implement the proposed bus terminal project near Tripunithura Railway  Station.

Immediate steps have been taken after the Kochi Metro Rail Limited (KMRL) decided to set up the terminal station of the Kochi Metro near the Railway station using the land of the Steel Authority of India. As per the plans of  the local body, it will construct a bus terminal on the 12.5 acres of land near the Railway Station.

According to them, if the project is implemented, Tripunithura will become  the terminal point for three major transportation systems, including Metro Rail, Southern Railways and private and KSRTC buses.

Tripunithura municipal chairman R Venugopal said the project will be  presented at the ‘Investors Meet’ scheduled to be held in early January in Kochi.

“Due to the proximity of the Metro Rail terminal station and Railway   station, private companies may come forward to take up the project. Then,  the project will be implemented on a Public-Private-Participation basis,” he  said.He added that they were taking measures to implement the project.  “Discussions are on in this regard with the Kerala Building Association,” he added.

A total of `120 crore will be needed to implement the project. From the  total amount, `80 crore would be spent on land acquisition.

Meanwhile, the demand from the part of the people for implementing the proposed bus terminal is getting louder.

Tripunithura Rajanagari Union of Residents Association and Tripunithura Janakeeya Samithi have announced protest measures from next month in the area for getting the project implemented. The organizations have demanded that state government to entrust the bus terminal project with Delhi Metro Rail Corporation.

 

Only 3,600 Buildings in City Utilising Harvested Rainwater

Print PDF

The New Indian Express               23.12.2013

Only 3,600 Buildings in City Utilising Harvested Rainwater

The State government’s effort to promote the use of rain water by making Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) mandatory in the city seems to have failed to produce the expected results. Less than 10 per cent of the building owners who have installed the RWH systems are using the harvested rain water.

The move was expected to reduce the burden on Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) and the excessive dependence on Cauvery water.

BWSSB Chief Engineer Kempramaiah said, “According to the data collected by us, only 3,600 building owners in the city are using the harvested rain water. Though more than 38,000 building owners have installed the RWH systems, they are using the harvested rain water to recharge the ground water despite the fact that rain water is very safe for drinking and other purposes.”

Chandrakala, a resident of Mahalakshmipuram, said, “We have installed the RWH system in our building. As the rain water flows from the terrace and other areas, where we normally walk, we do not feel like using it for drinking. Therefore, we use it to recharge the ground water.”

A R Shivkumar, Principal Investigator, Rainwater Harvesting, Karnataka State Council for Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Science  said, “In fact, rain water is very soft water and is safer than ground water that is drawn through borewells as the water becomes hard while percolating to the aquifers. Ground water has to be treated through reverse osmosis and other methods to remove the hardness in it. But one can consume rainwater just by disinfecting it.”

Shivkumar uses rain water that is harvested in his house at Vijaynagar for drinking and other purposes and does not rely on the Cauvery water supplied by the BWSSB. He says people should use harvested rainwater to effectively recharge the ground water only if they cannot use it due to their inhibitions or other reasons.

The State government had passed the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage (Amendment) Bill 2009 to make RWH mandatory in the city. It stipulated that those who construct buildings in an area of 1,200 sq meters or more should install RWH systems in their buildings within nine months.

However, many building owners have not installed RWH systems. “We are not authorised to take any action against the building owners who have not complied with the RWH rules. Therefore, we are unable to implement the rules as mentioned in the bill,” a BWSSB official said.

 

'Set Up Waste Units in all Assembly Segments'

Print PDF

The New Indian Express               23.12.2013

'Set Up Waste Units in all Assembly Segments'

High Court judges N Kumar and Nagarathna inspecting garbage processing units at Kuvempunagar along with officials of the BBMP on Sunday | Nagaraja Gadekal
High Court judges N Kumar and Nagarathna inspecting garbage processing units at Kuvempunagar along with officials of the BBMP on Sunday | Nagaraja Gadekal

Declaring that garbage should not be dumped in landfills, High Court Justice N Kumar on Sunday said he would issue an order to the BBMP to set up garbage processing units in each of the Assembly constituencies in its limits.

Justice Kumar made the statement while he was inspecting landfills with Justice Nagarathna. Addressing reporters after the inspection, Justice Kumar said segregation units must be set up so that the processing of waste is completed within the constituency limits. He warned of strict action, including cancellation of licences, against contractors who did not ensure proper segregation of waste.

The two HC judges visited the waste segregation unit in Kuvempunagar ward, Mavallipura landfill and the Terra Firma processing unit in Doddballapur. They were accompanied by BBMP Commissioner M Lakshminarayana.

Residents of Vidyaranyapura and Yelahanka, who came to the Kuvempunagar unit, blamed contractors for the absence of proper segregation in their wards. They claimed that lack of manpower and specialised equipment were key reasons for the non-segregation of waste. “Ever since a new contractor took over in December last year, the existing manpower of over 100 persons was cut to 53. They promised more equipment as well, but it did not happen,” a resident said.

Kalathur Layout Resident Welfare Association president R Premchand said the Palike had turned a blind eye to the problems of residents. “To win tenders, contractors show less number of workers and quote low amounts for the work. As a result, the waste does not get segregated and during rains, the areas get badly affected. The garbage also attracts stray dogs,” residents said.

The BBMP Commissioner said the civic body would implement all recommendations made by Justice Kumar and added that the setting-up of the units in each Assembly segment would also be cost-effective as it reduces transportation costs.

Apart from the existing dry waste segregation unit in Kuvempunagar, the BBMP plans to set up a wet waste management facility in the ward. However, this will be built in the vicinity of the ward where slum dwellers live. “Since the facility will have to be set up where the slum presently exists, we plan to build it once the rehabilitation of the slum dwellers is completed,” Lakshminarayana said.

At Mavallipura too, the inspection team had to listen to the civic woes of local residents. Muniraju, president of the Gantaganahalli Gram Panchayat, said, “Lot of people have died and many are affected. The groundwater is polluted and even cattle are yielding less milk while goats and sheep are having skin diseases. We want the people responsible for this mess to be punished and we had filed a PIL in the HC a year ago.”

 


Page 95 of 686