Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Slum Development / Housing

Row over demolition of school structure by Mhada

Print PDF

The Times of India           23.11.2010

Row over demolition of school structure by Mhada

PUNE: The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority's (Mhada) anti-encroachment drive in the Yerawada area has landed in a row over demolition of six tin sheds which were being used as classrooms by a school for slum children run by a local foundation. A part of the land on which the tin sheds were raised is reserved for school amenities.

The matter relates to the HGS Urdu School in the Nagpur housing board locality opposite Yerawada central jail. The school, run by Sanjeevani Foundation, operates Urdu medium classes up to Std IX, besides a play group and English-medium classes up to Std II.

The Mhada authorities have justified their demolition act on the grounds that the "unauthorised" structures occupied by the school had encroached upon a part of the plot (belonging to Mhada), which was legally allotted to some other person. Remaining part of this plot, reserved for school amenities, was never allotted to the foundation, they said. The foundation's plea for allotment is pending before the state department of housing, they added.

Office-bearers of Sanjeevani Foundation insisted that the sheds were built on the reserved plot and that, the Mhada officials acted in a "high-handed" manner while turning a Nelson's eye towards other encroachments on the land in subject.

"We have lost all our documents and records, not to mention the financial loss, owing to the demolition," said Javed Shadiwan, president, Sanjeevani Foundation. "The action has impacted 210 students from both, Urdu and English medium classes at our school," he added.

On Monday, the schoolchildren staged a protest demanding reinstatement of their school structure and denouncing Mhada for the action, which was taken around 1 pm on Saturday.

Shadiwan said, "Our school was recognised by the state government in 2004 and the Pune Municipal Corporation, too, has sanctioned classes. We have been teaching children, mostly from slums, for a nominal fee of Rs 100. The Mhada authorities acted unilaterally despite our pleas to let the students complete their academic year."

However, Shadiwan conceded that the school's application for allotment of the reserved land was pending clearance before the state government. "We have been following up the matter since the last three years and also held several meetings, in between, with Mhada authorities to convince them against acting in haste. Yet, they demolished the tin sheds overlooking recommendations from Mhada chairman Ankush Kakde asking Mhada authorities to find an apt solution to the issue," he said.

Rajendra Nimbalkar, Mhada's chief officer in Pune, dismissed the allegations levelled by Shadiwan as unjust and unfair. "The school already has a facility of its own and the tin sheds were being used as an extension facility without securing permission of any kind from us," he said.

Nimbalkar said, "We have issued notices on six occasions in the past (a fact acknowledged by Shadiwan) and have acted quite leniently in our meetings so far by allowing the school to use these structures on an assurance that they would be removed by November 10."

He said, "We have no issues if the school applies afresh for the reserved plot and get the same approved by the government, for re-starting the classes. However, its present plea pending before the government relates to the land which also includes a 460 sq mt plot that has been allotted to some other individual."

Nimbalkar maintained that Mhada had given the school ample opportunity to remove the structures and it was for the school authorities to ensure that they secured their records and documents.

 

HUDA to offer alternative housing to encroachers

Print PDF

The Times of India            23.11.2010 

HUDA to offer alternative housing to encroachers

GURGAON: Before the next High Court hearing on 3 December HUDA is making all efforts to settle the matter with owners of over 500 illegal houses that are blocking Northern Peripheral Road (NPR) project.

The ambitious road projects aims to drastically reduce the travel time between Dwarka and Gurgaon.The two four-lane corridors have 30 metres of green belt on both sides, but the project has been stuck due to court cases. The total project has 18.5 km long road and majority of it is stuck in court cases.

Even though these houses are illegal, HUDA is ready to provide alternative housing to the affected, a source close with the developments said. But the encroachers are said to be demanding plots instead of alternative houses.

The HUDA officials admit that encroachments have sprawled in major chunk of the project land and it would be tough to remove them since many of them have got court stay orders. For HUDA, senior officials admit that the situation is going out of control: The delay is costing a lot because the city is being deprived of crucial road infrastructure because of encroachments. But the encroachers are more worried about pocketing money, said a senior HUDA official. The HUDA had carried out a detailed mapping of the entire 18.5 km NPR.

The road will connect Dwarka and National Highway-8 near Kherki Dhaula. Senior official claimed that the encroachers located near Kherki Dhaula are most difficult to handle as they are hell bent of pursuing the court case. This has been causing a lot of problems.

The litigation has derailed the project. On one end the HUDA is drawing up all the plans, international experts are being roped in to make it one of the futuristic road projects but on the other end we are still grappling to clear encroachments, said the official.

HUDA official claimed that the authority would submit in the high court about the proposal of providing alternative houses to all the encroachers after they vacate the land.
 

Site largesse extends to staff, too

Print PDF

The Deccan Herald  23.11.2010

Site largesse extends to staff, too

Satish Shile, Bangalore, Nov 22, DHNS:

CM gave a BDA plot to the wife of priest who performs pooja for him

Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa made prime land allotments to not only his relatives but also his office staff.

Surekha Sangappa of Bookanakere in Mandya — where Yeddyurappa was born — has been bestowed with a 60X40 site at JP Nagar 8th Phase. She is closely related to one of chief minister’s sons-in-law.

A BDA site measuring 60X40 sqft costs about Rs 5.20 lakh but it is worth crores of rupees in the real estate market.

What’s intriguing is that a list of BDA site allottees obtained under the Right To Information Act by this newspaper does not mention who Sangappa is or the criterion under which she was granted the residential plot.

In yet another case, T Rajashekhar, a temporary staffer at Yeddyurappa’s home office, has been sanctioned a BDA site at HSR Layout II Phase. Rajashekhar, a retired high school headmaster, is from Shiralakoppa in Shikaripura represented by the chief minister in the Assembly. Yeddyurappa appointed him a PRO on contract basis. His son is a television journalist.

Since his ascendancy to power, Yeddyurappa has allotted 191 BDA sites under the G category. The list obtained from the BDA does not have any information about the beneficiaries. One of the beneficiaries on the list is said to be the wife a priest who performs pooja daily at the chief minister’s residence.

The BDA list includes his son B Y Raghavendra, his sister B S Premamma, his nephew S C Ashok, and a close relative, M Deepa. However, after the BJP central leadership pulled up the chief minister for his overt nepotism in allotting sites, most of his kin surrendered the sites.

The Bangalore Development Authority allots sites to only those who don’t possess any property in the capital. But Raghavendra was allotted a site despite him owning a flat and other non-residential properties in Bangalore.

But in recent times, it has been a practice among the chief ministers to allot sites to people’s representatives.

B M Shivakumar, an RTI activist who gleaned information about the chief minister allotting sites to his kith and kin, said there was no rule in the BDA Act that stipulated that sites should be given to people’s representatives. Under the discretionary quota of the chief minister, sites can be allotted only to eminent personalities who have made significant contribution to society.

“While MLAs and MPs get sites in prime locations, those who have been waiting for years are given sites on the city outskirts. Even if they secure a site, they end up paying a higher price than those who get sites under the G category. The government should scrap this category,” he said.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 09:27
 


Page 54 of 118