Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Solid Waste Management

Bangaloreans poor at waste separation

Print PDF

Deccan Herald               04.06.2013

Bangaloreans poor at waste separation

Not many Bangaloreans are willing to spend a few minutes at home to separate kitchen waste from other household wastes, even though they know perfectly well that waste separation at home actually helps in better waste management, which continues to be a problem area for India's IT capital.

With municipal solid waste management posing a big problem in Bangalore, 69 per cent of respondents participating in a six-city environment survey felt poor waste management would have adverse impact on human health.

Even though half of the people interviewed in the survey suggested segregation of the waste at source for proper disposal, not many are willing to do so at their home.

Only 11 per cent of people showed “high willingness” to segregate municipal waste and another 12 per cent showed “willingness” for the same.

A large number of respondents from the age group of 35–44 years (almost 50 per cent) said they were unwilling to segregate their waste at all.

Carried out by the Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), the environment survey 2013 capture citizen's perception on local environment in six cities – Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata and Mumbai.

The survey was based on interviewing 4,039 people from these cities, out of which 401 -- almost 10 per cent of total population -- are from Bangalore who were randomly picked up from different education, earning and livelihood background. It was released in the capital on Monday.

As for the reasons for their unwillingness for waste separation, 34 per cent consider separating the wastes to be a cumbersome task, 31 per cent feel they will need more space to keep the two separate bins, and 23 per cent consider segregation to be the responsibility of the local authority.

There is also a small percentage of respondents (11 per cent) that feels even if they segregate the wastes; it is not collected separately by the civic authorities.

“After segregating the waste, if the municipal authorities mix the same and dump both at landfill sites, then why to separate them at all,” wondered environmentalist Ravi Agarwal from Toxics Link, which was not a party to the TERI study.

However, among those respondents who have regular salaried jobs in the private sector, a very small percentage (less than 5 per cent) consider it to be a cumbersome task. They mostly think that the space constraint for segregation is the limiting factor

In the last five years, the survey notes, Bangalore has lost a large portion of its tree cover, bird presence and ground water availability.

The garbage dumping and collection had deteriorated in the same period and the quality of the city's air did not improve, they said.

 

Solid waste management

Print PDF

The Hindu                04.06.2013

Solid waste management

The Vijayawada Municipal Commissioner G.S. Panda Das, has put focus on solid waste management after his return from a short foreign tour. He inspected the dumping yard at Singhnagar, checked how many trips were being made by lorries and whether waste was being segregated – dry and wet. He also wanted recycling started so that not much of waste was required to be dumped and large open area will not be required.

 

Garbage collection from doorstep paying dividends

Print PDF

The Times of India                 03.06.2013

Garbage collection from doorstep paying dividends

SURAT: Tagged as one of the top three cleanest cities of the country, Surat is witnessing a distinct shift in garbage collection.

After elected wing declared it's intention to make public places of the city garbage and container-free a year ago, the steps taken by civic administration of Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC) to increase, strengthen and expand it's door-to-door collection network has started paying dividends now.

Today, the city sprawling over 326 sq km with nearly 10.5 lakh households, generates close to 1,500 tonnes of solid waste daily. More than half of this is collected from door-to-door on daily basis using nearly 325 vehicles.

SMC, one of the first civic bodies in the country, started this collection system in 2004 and by 2006 it had nearly 200 vehicles lifting 350-400 tonnes of garbage directly from homes. It spent nearly Rs 10 crore then against Rs 17 crore on yearly basis today.

"The desired effect of this expansion of door-to-door collection is seen on the garbage containers in the city. The numbers have come down by about 1,000," said EH Pathan, executive engineer, solid waste disposal, SMC.

"The effect of increased door-to-door garbage is that now we lift just 650-700 containers for disposal of garbage and expenses on this count has come down by nearly Rs 60 lakh per month," said Pathan and added, "This means, as we pay more for door-to-door collection, we are saving Rs 7 crore on annual basis on container lifting count and over all spending the same amount of money for higher amount of garbage disposal."

"We want our citizens to develop a habit of keeping garbage and litter that is produced in their homes or by them to be kept within the house. The network of SMC will collect it once a day to keep city clean and healthy," said mayor Raju Desai. "We don't want people to throw their garbage in containers outside their societies and spread pollution," he added.

Surat had 1,650 containers placed on different city roads and public places for garbage collection and it used to empty all of them either on daily basis or on alternate day basis spending nearly Rs 20 crore on annual basis.

SMC pays Rs 250 per trip for emptying a container.

Bhimji Patel, who recently retired as chairman of standing committee, said, "Money is not the main issue here. We are determined to keep our city cleanest of all and so would not mind paying a little more if required."

 


Page 97 of 265