Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Solid Waste Management

Garbage pile not moving despite complaints? Tell High Court

Print PDF

The Hindu                               05.03.2013

Garbage pile not moving despite complaints? Tell High Court

 
In a first, citizens can directly approach the court if ward committees fail to act.

Okay, so you’ve been watching that pile of garbage grow bigger and bigger and you’re complained yourself hoarse to the newly constituted ward committee but nothing’s been done about it.

Finally there’s action on that front: for the first time ever, Bangaloreans can on knock the High Court’s doors by filing an affidavit about inaction by the ward committees.

Pillar to post

A first-of-its-kind order allows citizens to come to the High Court directly instead of being shunted from pillar to post. In its order on Monday, a Division Bench comprising Justice N. Kumar and Justice B.V. Nagarathna asked people to first approach the ward committees, whose members also comprise those in the neighbourhood, with the local councillor as its chairperson.

Their details are all there on the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) website.

Should they fail to act on the garbage situation, citizens are free to approach the High Court with their problem.

The Bench was responding to public interest litigation (PIL) petitions on the subject. It reminded committees that “ensuring proper solid waste management (SWM) and sanitation work in the ward and finalising location of new public sanitation units” was one of their duties.

“Even after complaining to the ward committee, if no action is taken to [lift] the garbage, citizens can bring the issue to the notice of this court by filing an affidavit, giving all particulars of the complaints made to the WC, and this court would then pass necessary order after hearing the WC concerned,” the Bench said.

“The members of ward committees and the councillor can easily monitor waste management when they go for their morning walk as that is the time the people throw garbage on the street due to which the whole purpose of making segregation of garbage at source is lost,” the Bench observed orally.

Pointing out that people’s participation is not more merely becoming ward committee members, the Bench orally observed that those who take up the responsibility as members should monitor waste disposal means in their ward every day. They are accountable to the public as the law has entrusted them with such task.

Last Updated on Thursday, 18 April 2013 06:43
 

BBMP has inflated garbage output estimates, court told

Print PDF

The Hindu                                    05.03.2013

BBMP has inflated garbage output estimates, court told

Contractors’ payment details for last three years sought.

Payments to contractors based on approximate quantity of waste generated in the city has now come under the scrutiny of the Karnataka High Court as the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) on Monday admitted that garbage collected is far lesser than earlier estimates.

Noticing that approximate quantity of the garbage collected in eight zones of the city is around 3,400 tonnes to 3,599 tonnes a day as against 4,000 to 4,500 tonnes estimated earlier, the court asked BBMP Commissioner Siddaiah to place on record payments made to contractors in the last three years.

In its details submitted to the court about garbage weighed between February 1 and 28, the BBMP said it averaged 3,599.72 tonnes daily.

The Commissioner said that the BBMP is carrying out a survey on a pilot basis with a private firm’s help to get a realistic data on waste generated and collected in every ward, and the outcome of the survey would be placed at the next hearing.

To a query, he admitted that the garbage collected is much less than the BBMP’s estimate and that payments to contractors were made based on the estimated figures.

He also sought three months to fine-tune the data on garbage collection.

Following this, a Division Bench comprising Justice N. Kumar and Justice B.V. Nagarathna asked Mr. Siddaiah to submit the final data on garbage collection and payments.

‘Stop payment’

The Bench directed the BBMP not to release any money either to M.N. Sriramulu, chairperson of the Karnataka Safai Karamchari Commission or to the three persons in whose favour he had subcontracted a garbage collection contract awarded to him in December 2012-January 2013 in Kamakshipalya (ward no 101) and Shivanagar (ward no 107).

A petitioner had pointed out that Mr. Sriramulu cannot hold a contract as he is a public servant by virtue of his appointment as chairperson of the commission by the State government in February this year.

It was also alleged that the contract itself was obtained fraudulently.

The court asked the State government to take note of Mr. Sriramulu’s conduct and decide whether it is in public interest to let such persons continue to head a commission, which has the rank of a Minister of State.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 05 March 2013 06:07
 

Kochi corporation can't smell that stink

Print PDF

The Times of India                   04.03.2013 

Kochi corporation can't smell that stink

KOCHI: While a Vilappilsala like confrontation is building up over waste disposal at Brahmapuram solid waste treatment plant, it seems the Kochi corporation has decided to sleep over the crisis.

Recently, the residents of Vadavukodu-Puthencruz panchayats gave a three-month deadline for the civic body to come up with an alternative system to dispose plastic waste generated in the city and threatened them with closure. Though there are viable options available, according to experts, the civic body is unwilling to explore these possibilities and planning to continue the practice of dumping waste at Brahmapuram.

Waste management experts, who have studied the crisis in the city, contend that the local body has overlooked the need for scientific segregation of waste. Though academic institutions have offered help in training Kudumbasree workers to segregate plastic, based on its significance and economic value, the corporation has not responded to such initiatives. According to experts, the civic body should be able to bring in agencies that collect plastic at a mutually agreed price. This method will save the corporation from the troubles of transporting and dumping plastic at Brahmapuram.

"Many industries functioning within the state and neighbouring states require plastic as raw material. There are private agencies engaged in collection of segregated plastic, and local bodies should make use of this facility," said V Shivanandan Achari, assistant professor, department of environmental studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology (Cusat).

Municipalities such as Maradu have been following this system for the last one year. The local body has 33 divisions and they have clubbed three divisions to form a unit.

Kudumbasree workers are given 11 tricycles. Workers in each unit collect plastic waste from houses and other establishments. "They bring the waste to an enclosure where it is further segregated and sold to a private agency which takes the plastic to various industrial units in Tamil Nadu," said T K Devarajan, chairman, Maradu municipality.

Explaining the flip side of the system, he said that if the agency did not turn up to collect waste, it would adversely affect waste collection and disposal in the municipality.

"Though this method has been successful since its implementation in May 2012, for the last one week the agency has not collected plastic. Now, we have to sort out the issue," he added.
Last Updated on Monday, 04 March 2013 08:14
 


Page 143 of 265