Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Taxation

Construction without permission: Builder to cough up Rs 50 lakh fine

Print PDF

Indian Express    26.05.2010

Construction without permission: Builder to cough up Rs 50 lakh fine

MANOJ MORE Tags : crime, corporation, construction without permission Posted: Wed May 26 2010, 04:19 hrs

 Pune:  The Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) has decided to impose a fine of Rs 50 lakh on Vikrant Developers that constructed four extra floors without permission at its Pimple Nilakh project. The project ran into controversy last week after allegations surfaced that it was constructed by changing the course of a nullah and pushing a floodline inside.

PCMC deputy engineer Vasant Kachi said the builder was granted permission for constructing eight floors 2007. “However, it has been found that four floors of the three buildings of Midori Towers were constructed without permission,” he said. Kachi said the PCMC will impose a compounding fees on the builder to regularise the project as demanded by him. “He had submitted his transfer of development rights (TDR) plan for the extra floors. If a TDR file is pending with us and a builder constructs illegal floors, he can get it regularised by paying a compound fees. Here, the builder faces a fine of over Rs 50 lakh, 20 per cent of the project cost,” he said.

Mayor Yogesh Behl said the builder will be fined for constructing four extra floors and added, “I will start the investigation after I get all the documents.”

Avinash Gaikwad, director of Vikrant Developers, said he will pay the fine. “My TDR was pending with the civic body and hence I constructed the extra floors,” he said. PCMC officials said the builder cannot sell the extra 36 flats till they are regularised.

The project ran into controversy after Sena corporator Seema Savle produced documents procured under RTI showing that the project was accommodated by pushing floodline inside, changing the course of a nullah. “The floodline has been changed as the builder is a relative of a former top irrigation official,” alleged Savle in a letter to the CM and the Municipal Commissioner. Gaikwad said no floodline has been changed. “I had submitted the proposal in 2006-2007 and the floodline was marked in 2009,” he said. Regarding the nullah, he said, “The PCMC is doing storm water treatment work and I will pay whatever is needed.”

Last Updated on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 11:31
 

Park and pay only Rs 10

Print PDF

Hindustan Times  26.05.2010

Park and pay only Rs 10

Do not pay more than Rs 10 for parking your car up to 10 hours at any MCD parking lot and Rs 20 up to 24 hours. In DDA-controlled lots, the charge for upto 12 hours is Rs 10 and Rs 15 for 24 hours.

Anything charged beyond that is illegal.

The civic bodies submitted the statements of existing parking fees in the Delhi High Court on Tuesday after a lawyer, Sugriva Dubey, complained he was charged Rs 700 for parking his car for seven hours at the New Delhi railway station.

The MCD had assured the court in 2008 that parking rate at any site would remain Rs 10 for any duration.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 07:53
 

Authorities say raising tax necessary

Print PDF

The Times of India      26.05.2010

Authorities say raising tax necessary

VARANASI: The recent hike in house tax as per the new circle rate announced by Varanasi Nagar Nigam (VNN) administration may have caused furore in the mini-assembly, but the authorities believe that the move is necessary to realise the much-needed funds for the municipal corporation even though it has put additional burden on the pockets of denizens.

As per SN Singh, additional municipal commissioner, while the GIS survey last year witnessed increase in the number of households under VNN, the recent hike would pave the way for generation of funds for development. "There is no other option but to go for hike in the house tax to provide momentum to the development work in different parts of the city," he claimed.

It may be mentioned here that the mini-assembly of VNN witnessed uproarious scene on Monday, in which a number of local ward corporators representing various political parties protested against the decision to hike the house tax (nearly 30 to 50 per cent). The members not only burnt copies of papers that displayed the notices of hike in house tax, but also rejected the decision of VNN administration to hike the house tax in the city.

The house was not taken into confidence and it was the unilateral decision of VNN administration, said Manoj Rai Dhupchandi, a local ward corporator from Samajwadi party (SP). Local BJP MLA Shyamdeo Roy Choudhary, who was present in the meeting, added that sudden hike in house tax would put additional burden on residents and the matter would be also raised in the coming state assembly meeting in Lucknow.

It is also worth mentioning that the city witnesses collection of house tax as per self assessment of house tax implemented from April 1, 2004. The house tax was hiked to nearly 15 per cent after GIS survey in 2009 that also increased the number of households from 1.41 lakh to nearly 1.54 lakh in the city.

Fast Facts

# The self-assessment of annual rental value of houses under different circles in the city, serving the basis for calculation of various property taxes including house tax, water tax and sewer tax are implemented from April 1, 2004

# The recent hike in house tax is between 30 to 50 per cent while the figure is around 30 per cent for water and sewer tax in the city

# As per GIS survey in 2009, there are 1.54 lakh households under the purview of property tax

# There are 2.12 lakh water supply connections in different parts of the city

What does the rule say?

# As per Section 172 of UP Municipal Corporation Act, 1959, municipal corporation can impose various kinds of taxes including property tax

# The sub-section (B) of the section also vests power with municipal commissioner to hike taxes for generating funds for development of municipal corporation from time to time

# The Section 173 of the act gives account of various kinds of property taxes that could be imposed on the basis of annual rental value of the land where it is to be taken. It includes house tax, water tax (where water is supplied though connections), sewer tax (in areas connected with sewerage pipeline) and conservancy tax (where toilets and bathrooms are operated and maintained by municipal corporation)

(Source: VNN office)

 


Page 193 of 265