Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Taxation

Mayor against property tax hike

Print PDF

The Hindu 05.02.2010

Mayor against property tax hike

Special Correspondent

Says GHMC proposal will be placed before the council

 


Steps will be taken to clear BPS applications by March 31

Promises to initiate action against violators of fire safety norms


Hyderabad: In a first major show of difference over the functioning of the GHMC, Mayor Banda Kartika Reddy, struck out against the proposed property tax hike. The Corporation might have sent proposals to government in this regard but she is not in favour of it.

This was indicated by Ms. Reddy at the “meet the press” programme organised by the Hyderabad Union of Journalists at Press Club here on Thursday.

Expressing reservations over the move, she felt there could be other ways of increasing the GHMC revenue without raising the property tax.

The defaulters could be brought under the tax net and the arrears could be collected effectively. “The proposal will be placed before the council and a decision taken”, she said.

In the same breath, Ms. Reddy also expressed disappointment over the slow pace of BPS-LRS and said steps would be taken to dispose off all pending applications by March 31.

Circle wise melas would be organised. She also agreed to consider extending the BPS.

At ease

Ms. Reddy carried off the hour long encounter with the media confidently. Even ticklish questions she fielded with ease. Was she in favour of united Andhra, separate Telangana or a union territory status for Hyderabad?

“Good question”, Ms. Reddy said and after a pause replied “no comments”.

Even a personal question about efforts to make her husband, Banda Chandra Reddy, as OSD, didn’t unnerve her.

“He is a politician in his own right. I may take his views but the decisions will be mine”, she shot back.

What about the reported differences between her and her deputy, Jaffar Husain Meraj?

“There is no such thing. We are like a family. In fact he calls me chellamma”, she remarked. But many a question on encroachments, traffic congestion and pollution drew the stock reply “I will take action”.

The Mayor refused to be drawn into the controversy about removal of religious structures from the middle of the roads. ‘Efforts will be taken to ease the traffic”, is all that she would say.

She promised stringent action against violators of fire safety norms. Schools, shopping malls, apartment complexes which are not conforming to the norms would be identified and legal notices served as per a time bound programme.

Last Updated on Friday, 05 February 2010 05:19
 

Property tax revision likely

Print PDF

The Hindu 04.02.2010

Property tax revision likely

Special Correspondent


GHMC seeks government’s nod due to the political implications involved


HYDERABAD: The GHMC is getting ready to revise property tax rates for both residential and non-residential buildings from the forthcoming financial year of 2010-2011.

It has sought the government’s nod because of the political implications involved though as a local body the GHMC is empowered to issue a notification straightaway. Citing its weak financial state, removal of 50 per cent hike cap put on non-residential (or commercial buildings) a couple of years ago, when tax rates were enhanced last time, was also urged.

More of rationalisation

Then the government also did not allow any revision of tax for residential properties. There is not going to a straightaway hike but “rationalising” of tax structure with varying rates area wise unlike the present uniform structure, claim senior officials.

They also point out self-assessment of property tax introduced more than a decade ago with a base rate between Re 1 to 40 paisa had “outlived” its purpose. “How long can we have a common tax rate for all areas having different property values,” asked a senior official.

When tax structure was rationalised for commercial properties, the city was divided into 115 main zones and 300-odd minor zones with rates depending on property usage. The city is to be divided into 30-40 zones for residential properties to decide the rates. The calculation of tax is also to be simplified with a fixed rate per square foot of property depending on the proposed new zone.

“This will remove discretionary powers of bill collectors,” explained the official. A draft notification calling for objections and suggestions would be issued before implementing the revised tax rates.

Last Updated on Thursday, 04 February 2010 05:26
 

Only Rs 13.73 crore tax hike approved

Print PDF

The Times of India 05.02.2010

Only Rs 13.73 crore tax hike approved

SURAT: Bowing to public pressure and demand of its elected representatives, the ruling BJP has decided to reduce the proposed tax hike rate as suggested in the 2010 draft budget, which was recently presented by Surat municipal commissioner.

After a three-day discussion, the standing committee of Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC) has decided to slash the proposed tax hike to nearly 30 per cent of the proposed amount and left the residential category untouched in the election year. Against the proposed increase of Rs 53.19 crore in the draft budget by way of hike in property tax by 11 per cent and 15 per cent in user charges, the standing committee rejected the proposal of Rs 39.36 crore and only approved a raise in tax rates totalling Rs 13.73 crore.

Standing committee chairman Mukesh Dalal said, "We thought the proposed tax hike will not find favour with the common man in the golden jubilee year of the state. We did not want the common man to suffer any hardships due to increase in taxes. Therefore, we have decided to slash the hike proposals by Rs 40 crore."

As per the standing committee's decision, the city will see only Rs 13.73 crore of tax hike during 2010-11. The municipal commissioner in her proposed budget had estimated Rs 256.44 crore from user charges and taxes, including the hike of Rs 53.19 crore. The standing committee has brought that figure down to Rs 216.98 crore by slashing Rs 39.36 crore of proposed taxes.

The amendments have left out all the resident owners from the hike. There is only a marginal increase in non-residential property owners' taxes, reduction in tenant used property tax from the proposed limit and the user charges for non-resident properties have also been slashed.

"We are aware that tax hike is needed, but we can't overlook the problems faced by common people. We have tried our best to balance things with the objective that people of the city don't have to suffer from high taxes," mayor Ranjit Gilitwala said.

 


Page 213 of 265