Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Urban Development

Old projects give GCDA a new hope

Print PDF

The New Indian Express 25.08.2009

Old projects give GCDA a new hope



KOCHI: The State Government last week sanctioned nearly 10 projects submitted by the Greater Cochin Development Authority (GCDA). Even though they are not fresh proposals, the GCDA can now heave a sigh of relief.

Among the list, one project crucial to the development of the city is the much discussed Ring Road. At an estimated cost of Rs 184.8 crore, the GCDA is planning to complete the work in four phases. In the first phase, the 10 km stretch from Chathiath to Varappuzha will be completed.

The second phase will cover the 16 km stretch from National Highway (NH) 17 to Athani. The third phase will connect NH-47 to Puthenkruz and the last phase will see the road getting connected to Madavana from Puthenkruz.

GCDA chairperson M C Josephine said that they would consider the possibility of including the project under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) scheme for its fast implementation.

The other projects that were sanctioned last week include a multilevel parking facility and a shopping mall of international standards at Manappattiparambu, Kaloor.

Angamaly Neighbourhood Centre is another project that was sanctioned.

“For the Angamaly Neighbourhood scheme, the GCDA is planning to acquire 40 acres of land where a residential and commercial centre will come up. In future it will serve as a satellite township,” Josephine added.

Another project that was cleared is the construction of a shopping complex at the KINCO Jetty, Marine drive. The concept is to build a commercial centre in the area. The eight storeyed building will accommodate petty vendors on the first floor, while other floors will be rented out for official and commercial purposes.

Former GCDA chairman Antony Isaac said that almost all the projects that were sanctioned this year were proposed five years ago.

“Most of the projects were suggested years ago. The authorities had earmarked these projects in the annual budgets for many years, but could not initiate the work without the State Government’s approval,” Antony said.

The survey work for the Ring Road project was completed in 2005 itself.

At that time the GCDA was asked to conduct two types of technical survey.

It will be a great benefit to Kochiites if the Ring Road becomes a reality soon. The project will reduce travel time from Ernakulam to Paravur to 15 minutes.

“What the GCDA can do now is to go further with the tender proceedings and land acquisition measures.

A public private participation (PPP) model will be apt for these projects.

If you are depending only on governmental aid, chances are high for a delay because of red tapism. And the progress of the project will be affected whenever there is a change in government,’’ Antony Isaac said.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 09:55
 

Kochi eyes a metro stamp

Print PDF

The New Indian Express 25.08.2009

Kochi eyes a metro stamp

KOCHI: Keeping hopes afloat of a metro status for Kochi in the future, the State Government has taken the initiative to get approval from the Union Government for building a metropolitan area on the basis of the Kochi rural agglomeration plan under the JNNURM and the city development plan, official sources said.

A metropolitan area usually combines an agglomeration (the neighboring municipal or suburban areas) with peripheral zones not necessarily urban in character but closely bound to the centre by employment or commerce. These zones are sometimes known as a commuter belt and may extend well beyond the urban margin.

“The population in a metropolitan area is crucial in determining many things. For example, the JNNURM scheme chooses areas to fund based on metropolitan population,’’ said an official in charge of the JNNURM project.

The Kochi urban agglomeration constituted on the basis of census data 2001 consists of the Corporation of Kochi, five municipalities, 15 panchayats and parts of three panchayats. The five municipalities are Tripunithura, Kalamassery, North Paravur, Aluva and Angamaly.

The 15 panchayats are Thrikkakkara, Cheranelloor, Eloor, Varapuzha, Chennamangalam, Kadamakkudy, Mulavukad, Thiruvankulam, Maradu, Kadungalloor, Alangad, Chengamanad, Choornikkara, Edathala and Kottuvally.

The official said that the Kochi Urban Agglomeration for the JNNURM project comprises the Kochi Corporation, Tripunithura and Kalamassery municipalities and 13 panchayats.

“The Census Commission recognises cities with a population of above 40 lakh as metropolitan cities. Once the agglomeration is completed and the rest of the municipalities and urban centres are merged with the proposed metropolitan area, Kochi can raise its claim for metro status on the basis of population,” the official added.

“Another criteria for claiming metro status is the capital status. Since Thiruvananthapuram is the state capital, Kochi is left with the choice of claiming it on the basis of population,” he added.

Apart from this Kochi has a floating population. “This will also be counted while considering the metro status,” the official said.

Urban centres under the existing Greater Cochin Development Area (GCDA) too would merge with the proposed metropolitan area.

Hopes are high to see Kochi being listed in the rank of cities like Mumbai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata and Chennai.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 09:51
 

Urban renewal mission plagued by delays, cost overruns: study

Print PDF

The Hindu 25.08.2009

Urban renewal mission plagued by delays, cost overruns: study

Siddhesh Inamdar

“Urban poor meted out injustice as local needs not addressed”

 


It has merely 10 per cent completed projects

The two-year study was commissioned by a non-governmental organisation


Mumbai: The much-touted Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) has received flak from a panel of eminent economists and researchers here for its dismal record of merely 10 per cent completed projects.

The panel observed that the Union government’s Rs. 1,25,000-crore flagship urban development programme, which promotes Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) for financing infrastructure in 63 cities, was plagued by tremendous delays and cost overruns.

These were the findings of a two-year study commissioned by the Bank Information Centre, a non-governmental organisation that partners with civil society in developing countries to influence international financial institutions (World Bank, Asian Development Bank, etc.) to promote socio-economic justice.

The study observed that the policy reforms under the JNNURM (repealing the Urban Land Ceiling Act, for instance) were based on the recommendations of these international banks. The resultant promotion to private financing of urban infrastructure “hollowed out urban local governments” and meted out injustice to the urban poor by not addressing local needs, it said.

This was explained with an example by urban planner Dr. Lalitha Kamath, co-author of the report that was released. “Under the Greater Bangalore Water Supply and Sanitation Project, the beneficiaries were made to bear the capital cost. That is, they had to pay for the cost of even laying the pipes,” she said. “The beneficiaries thus contributed 35 per cent of the project’s cost. Despite this, people who paid up in 2005 haven’t got water connections yet.”

The other co-author Vinay Baindur, researcher and activist on urban issues, said that the JNNURM thus failed to provide for the basic needs of the urban poor while focusing on “big ticket” infrastructure projects, as the emphasis remained on attracting private financing.

He added that despite the JNNURM’s limited success, the Centre decided to take an additional loan of Rs. 25,000 crore from the World Bank for Phase 1 and proposed to launch Phase 2 for all towns having a population of 5 to 10 lakh.

The study observed that the current model diluted the role for local, popularly elected governments, instead creating parallel bureaucratic structures to manage infrastructure projects financed by international financial institutions.

Chief economist of the Aditya Birla Group Dr. Ajit Ranade, who released the report said, “We don’t have any role models [from developing countries] to replicate as we try to figure out how to manage a city with a 20 million population.” Though the job was difficult, infrastructure was a public good and so had to be developed through public money.

He said he was unconvinced about the insufficiency of public money to develop infrastructure, given that the national budget was to the tune of Rs. 10 lakh crore. “I know there is a huge fiscal deficit, but the problem lies elsewhere,” he said.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 04:58
 


Page 180 of 205