Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Urban Encroachment

Panchkuian traders move SC, demolition put on hold

Print PDF
Indian Express  11.11.2010

Panchkuian traders move SC, demolition put on hold

Though the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) was supposed to start demolishing the famous furniture market at Panchkuian Road on Wednesday, it was cancelled after traders appealed against it in the Supreme Court.

Speaking to Newsline, Sanjiv Kumar, the lawyer representating the Panchkuian Road Market Association, said the date for hearing the appeal has been set for Friday. “We have not been informed where the hearing will take place,” he said.

The traders’ association is fighting the case as they are unhappy with the rehabilitation plan. The authorities had decided to demolish the market after the DMRC came up with a plan to build a Metro route (Blue Line) that runs right through the middle of Panchkuian Road. The traders were asked to shift to a new building, which would be constructed at Bhai Veer Singh Marg near St Columbus School. However, they moved the court in 2006, contending that their shops cannot function from a multi-storeyed building.

At present, traders at the market — which has 205 shops — say they have inspected the new building and found it “unsuitable”.

“The structure has been built like a government office building, with tiny cubicles. It does not look like a market at all,” said KS Bedi, president of the market association.

“The building currently has just 49 shops on the ground floor, which is not enough. When we pointed that out, they said we should move to the other floors. But we want them to build more shops on the ground floor,” Bedi said.

Stating that there was no reason to hurry, he said, “The Metro was built without us moving away, and it is now running with our shops hardly posing a problem. We are ready to shift, but we want our shops on the ground floor — which will take one-and-a-half years in the making. Once that is done, we will leave.”

Last Updated on Thursday, 11 November 2010 11:09
 

BDA's demolition drive sends panic waves

Print PDF

The Times of India           11.11.2010

BDA's demolition drive sends panic waves

 BANGALORE: 5am, Wednesday. Over 15 families on 4th main, 6th A cross, OMBR Layout, woke up to a rude shock. The demolition operation by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) to recover its 2 acre-2 gunta-land on survey number 27 had these families panicking. Worse, they didn't know whom to approach for help __ the BDA or BBMP. For, while the then BMP collected tax, the BDA said the area came under their jurisdiction.

The operation began on the small sheds on vacant sites and suddenly abandoned by noon. But residents, who are mostly senior citizens, fear the worst. The contradicting replies by the officials there also increased their fears. Even their corporator Kodanda Reddy who was on the spot could do nothing.

An aged Suresh Kumar, who was shocked, was trying to recover from his loss. The small shed he built in 2002 on his 80 feet x 60 feet site was gone. And with it, even his dreams of finally building a house. "He had no money before. We had just received the plan sanction from the BBMP and were to begin construction work by this week. But now, BDA says it's their property. They have asked us to approach the court,'' his relative explained. They now hope to at least save his house on another plot built in the same problem zone.

Low finances forced the families to invest on these revenue sites. But little did they realize that even valid documents of the sites from the original land owner could land them in trouble.

FINDING ANSWERS

"We don't know what will happen. I cannot build another house now nor ask my children for help,'' reacted a worried V S Thandavamurthy (66). He had invested all his savings on this house here. His question: "How can the BDA say it is theirs? When I purchased this site in 1992, the middleman assured us that it was a revenue site __ out of the BDA limits __ and that, it can be registered `pucca'. After registration, we also applied for the loan,'' he explained opening his bulky file to show all the documents carefully preserved over the years.

This included a CMC khata, khata extract, plan sanction by then village panchayat, encumbrance certificate and receipts proving the regular property tax payments to the BBMP till the present block period. But even that was not easy. "Till 1997, BBMP did not accept tax from us saying it was under BDA. But in '98, we suddenly got a BMP notice asking us to pay tax since 1995, when the house was completed,'' he added.

In 1995, following a newspaper report, he had also applied for regularization of the land. But the Supreme Court order that stayed the proposal later rendered this useless.

On rough estimates, there are at least 15 houses and eight vacant sites on this survey number. Majority of the property owners are senior citizens who invested all their savings on the houses. Interestingly, their original land owner Anjaneya Reddy is also one among them. But, just as the demolition started, he was missing.

However, TOI got in the local MLA K J George to intervene and halt the demolition `for now'. Not happy with this temporary relief, the residents want to seal this issue with the BDA commissioner and their MLA.
"They should listen to us at least now. We can't lead our retired life in fear for no fault of ours,'' said B Raja Reddy who bought a house here three years back.

 

BBMP will continue to punish building violation

Print PDF

The New Indian Express  10.11.2010

BBMP will continue to punish building violation

BANGALORE: The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike upped the ante on its ongoing drive to penalise violations in building constructions. In a release, the Palike has asserted that they would continue the drive and have directed officials concerned in the Department of Town Planning and other departments to pursue the same.

The Palike has also stated that their earlier operations could not derive the desired results as many zonal offices were understaffed and had to face other similar problems.

Meanwhile the Palike directed engineers to carry out periodic inspections. The departments have been instructed to send the approved plans to the subdivisions within a week.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 10:49
 


Page 99 of 167