Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Urban Planning

State snubs report on illegal buildings, officials to face heat

Print PDF

The Hindu                      16.02.2013

State snubs report on illegal buildings, officials to face heat

Corporation had earlier drawn up a list of 21 officials who issued permitsResponsibility has to be fixed on erring officials,says Minister
Corporation had earlier drawn up a list of 21 officials who issued permitsResponsibility has to be fixed on erring officials,says Minister.
 
Corporation report absolves its officials, blames builders.

Trouble awaits officials of the Kochi Corporation who aided unauthorised constructions in the city.

Rejecting a report prepared by the Kochi Corporation absolving its officials and blaming the builders for violation of building laws, the State government has sought a “precise and clear” report from the civic body. The government has sought detailed information on violations and the particulars of officials involved in the deals.

It was earlier reported in these columns that the corporation had drawn up a list of 21 officials who had issued permits and other certificates to 34 buildings, which were constructed in violation of the Kerala Municipal Building Rules and other laws.

The blatant violation of building rules was exposed by the Vigilance Wing of the Senior Town Planner’s Office. The State government had sought the views of the civic body following the vigilance investigation.

‘Vague report’

Manjalamkuzhi Ali, Minister for Urban Affairs, said the “Kochi Corporation’s report was rejected as it was a vague one.” “The file has been returned to the civic body asking for specific details of violations and the officials responsible for allowing such violations in the city. Responsibility has to be specifically fixed on erring officials,” Mr. Ali said.

Many instances of violation of buildings rules were detected across the State in the vigilance investigation. The government is looking for specific information on violations to act against the offenders, he said.

Though an amnesty scheme was announced three years ago to regularise illegal constructions in the State, hardly 20 per cent of the violations were regularised. It should be with the support of the officials that the unauthorised constructions are evading action, which needs to be checked, he said.

According to vigilance officials, the corporation officials who issued occupancy certificates for buildings which were constructed violating the rules would be held responsible for their illegal act.

The argument that the builders are responsible for violations does not hold water as it is the liability of the corporation officials to verify whether the structure was constructed according to the approved plan.

Occupancy certificates should be issued to buildings only when they are completed as per the approved plan and observing all mandatory regulations.

The serious violations of building rules include construction of the structure above the permitted floor area ratio, shortage of open space in front of the buildings and setback space on four sides of the buildings. Tough action will be initiated in cases involving serious violations, he said.

Last Updated on Saturday, 16 February 2013 10:02
 

Corporation defends officials, blames builders for violations

Print PDF

The Hindu                           15.02.2013

Corporation defends officials, blames builders for violations

A large number of violations were unearthed by the Vigilance Wing of the Senior Town Planner’s Office
 
A large number of violations were unearthed by the Vigilance Wing of the Senior Town Planner’s Office.
Civic body releases names of officials who had issued permits to buildings that violated laws.

Blaming the builders squarely for flouting the building laws, Kochi Corporation has given a clean chit to its officials in most of the cases. A large number of violations were unearthed by the Vigilance Wing of the Senior Town Planner’s (STP) Office.

The corporation has also released the names of 21 officials who had issued permits in cases identified by the STP officials after much persuasion by the Local Administration Department. The names were sought for initiating legal action against the erring officials. The list contains the names of a former corporation secretary, corporation engineer, town planning officer, assistant executive engineer and building inspectors among others.

In as many as 10 cases, the corporation defended its actions and claimed that its officials cannot be held responsible for the violations. However, in a few cases where it had issued notices to the builders for violations, the corporation has abstained from stating that it was not responsible for the violations.

While discounting the findings as baseless in some cases, the corporation also stated that it had issued notices to builders in some cases for regularising the violations.

In its state-wide drive carried out last year, the STP had identified 34 cases in Kochi, including the violation of the Kerala Municipal Building Rules, deviations in front, side and rear yards of buildings and violations in setback area from roads. The agency had also detected violations of Floor Area Ratio and coverage, guidelines of town planning schemes and additional constructions/floors without permit in Kochi.

In the case of a commercial building constructed by the Procurator, Arch Bishops’ House Ernakulam, (Permit no KRP2\556\07.DT.27\3\08), the parking space proposed in the basement floor did not satisfy the building rule provisions. The Floor Area Ratio of the building exceeded the permissible limit as per the area provided in the approved plan, it was reported. The report also stated that the number of vehicles as indicated in the plan could not be parked in the basement floor and scooter parking space was not provided in the approved plan. Moreover, loading/unloading space as mandated by rules was not proposed in the approved plan.

Admitting the findings of the STP as true, the Kochi Corporation said it had issued notice to the builder for rectifying the defects. It also stated that its officials cannot be blamed for the violations.

In another case, (Permit no: MoP1/93/09 dt 3/6/09), the corporation has even tried to dilute the findings of the vigilance officials. The STP, in its report, had pointed out that the parking area proposed in the building was converted into shop area and the construction was carried out by deviating from the approved plan.

The corporation, while admitting that it had allowed fixing of rolling shutters in the front portion of the parking area, maintained that the area could still be used for parking purposes. While blaming the builder for violating the approved plan, the corporation maintained that it had issued notice against the illegal construction.

The list contains the names of a former corporation secretary, corporation engineer, town planning officer, assistant executive engineer and building inspectors among others.

Last Updated on Friday, 15 February 2013 07:54
 

PCMC wants all new buildings to be eco-friendly

Print PDF

PCMC wants all new buildings to be eco-friendly

PUNE: The PimpriChinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) wants all new buildings that come up in the township in the next three-four years to be eco-friendly structures.

Addressing a workshop on green buildings in Pimpri on Tuesday, municipal commissioner Shrikar Pardeshi said, "The population of Pimpri-Chinchwad will increase to 45 lakh by 2040, which will be 2.5 times the current population. Ours is the fastest growing city in the state and third fastest growing city in the country. If we want the next generation to have the same quality of environment that we have, we need to plan our future now. The PCMC envisions that buildings coming up in the city after three to four years will be green buildings."

Pardeshi said, "There is large-scale illegal dumping of debris in rivers. The civic body has constructed several sewage treatment plants in the city, but only around 70% sewage generated in the city is treated at these plants. We need to implement green initiatives so that we do not have to repent later."

He added, "The civic body is giving incentives to builders and flat buyers to promote construction of green buildings in the city. We want citizens to take benefit of this. Many large residential complexes have their own sewage treatment plants and good drainage system, but fail to maintain them properly. They should rectify this."

Sanjay Deshpande, chairman of Credai's environment committee, made a presentation on 'Green building initiative - PCMC's efforts and Credai-PMR stakeholders'. He said green buildings were needed for sustainable growth.

Enumerating the hurdles faced in popularising the concept, Deshpande said, "There is a lack of public awareness and lack of demand from end users (flat buyers). There are insufficient incentives for builders and buyers and also poor coordination among various government agencies regarding supporting policies."

Deshpande said there were several misconceptions about green buildings as well.

"One myth is that green building measures are a nuisance to a project. The second is that it is only for large projects and that the measures are costly. Another myth is that there are delays in obtaining permissions and that the concept is not for residential buildings."

Developer Sandeep Sonigara said that in such buildings, a large part of residents' energy requirements are fulfilled through solar and wind power. Gearless and weight-sensitive lifts running on solar power are used to reduce electricity consumption.

Priyanka Kochhar, programme manager, strategic partnerships and implementation at Association for Development and Research of Sustainable Habitats (ADaRSH) explained the application process to get a green rating from GRIHA.
 


Page 65 of 328