Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Urban Planning

Regularisation of illegal colonies gets L-G nod, but easier said than done

Print PDF

The Indian Express   05.09.2012

Regularisation of illegal colonies gets L-G nod, but easier said than done

  Cc

Lieutenant-Governor Tejendra Khanna late on Tuesday night approved the regularisation of unauthorised colonies in Delhi.

However, going by the Union government’s last amendment of the guidelines for regularising colonies in June this year, unauthorised colonies may not be regularised before the cost of land, on which the settlements are located, is recovered.

According to Clause 5.4 of the amended guidelines from the Union Urban Development Ministry “...GNCTD (Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi) will issue orders regularising the colony as per the boundaries fixed after the recovery of cost of land on behalf of land owning agency in respect of colonies on public land..”

When asked, Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit only said, “The issue will be discussed in the Delhi Assembly on Wednesday but this is not a process that will be completed overnight.”

Parliamentary Secretary Mukesh Sharma told Newsline on Tuesday, “The L-G has approved the list of 917 colonies that the Delhi government had sent to his office recently. The issue will be discussed in the Delhi Assembly on Wednesday.”

A senior government official said the clause would cause some ambiguity, particularly for those colonies that have been constructed on government land.

“This clause from the amended guidelines states that a colony can be notified only after the land owning agency — Delhi government, Delhi Development Authority or the Land and Development Office — recovers the cost of the land from that particular Residents’ Welfare Association (RWA),” the official said.

He said this complication would not arise for those colonies on private land.Incidentally, of the list of 917 colonies that the L-G approved, only 315 are on private land, while the remaining are on government-owned land.

A senior Congress legislator said the government had begun the process to start collecting money from those RWAs that are on government land. “This is not a simple issue, the Delhi government has set the boundaries for the colonies and now the colonies would have to pay the cost of that land before regularisation,” he said.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 September 2012 10:57
 

Mangalore City Corporation now has 'marshals' for council meets

Print PDF

The Times of India     05.09.2012

Mangalore City Corporation now has 'marshals' for council meets

MANGALORE: Smartly dressed men in white uniform now guard the entry gates of Mangala council hall of Mangalore City Corporation. Regular employees of city corporation drawn from its various sections including town planning, and establishment, double up as 'marshals' to carry out orders of the Mayor as and when the council convenes under the city's first citizen.

These 'marshals' also regulate the entry to the visitors' gallery.Incidentally, BBMP at the first council meeting of the greater Bangalore civic body chaired by then Mayor SK Natraj had forwarded a resolution to the state government seeking services of 'marshals' to regulate unruly behaviour by corporators. But this has not fructified so far just as a similar resolution adopted by the city corporation here for regular marshals drawn from state police and a task force on lines of BMTF be set up locally as well.M Shankar Bhat, former mayor, during whose tenure such a resolution was adopted told TOI that the powers of 'marshals' should be well-defined so that they can discharge their duties effectively.

Else these 'marshals' who are regular employees run the risk of earning the ire of corporators in case the former evict the latter on directions from the Mayor. The government has also consistently denied our request for a BMTF like task force, he added.K Harish Kumar, commissioner said duty of 'marshals' is to regulate entry of officials and corporators from separate entrances at the council hall gates and enter the council on Mayor's direction. The white uniform given to the 'marshals' has letters MCC emblazoned on front pockets, shirt sleeve as well as their cap with green and yellow shoulder straps. Nonetheless, this is a first of its kind venture for any city corporation in the state, he avers.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 September 2012 06:26
 

NMC's TDR proposal showed Sonegaon lake as 'heritage land'

Print PDF

The Times of India     04.09.2012

NMC's TDR proposal showed Sonegaon lake as 'heritage land'

NAGPUR: The Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) would have got possession of the Sonegaon lake two years ago if it had not gone against the rules and prepared the proposal to grant transfer of development rights (TDR). NMC had prepared the TDR proposal by citing the lake as 'heritage land', to try and get around the rules.

NMC's town planning department said there were directives from the high court to take further steps on the Sonegaon lake issue. Accordingly, NMC started the process to acquire the lake in 2009. Despite various bylaws, and even the Supreme Court's order, to acquire the lake, NMC took the decision to 'purchase' the lake by granting TDR.

Accordingly, NMC obtained applications dated December 2, 2009, from the two owners of the lake Dr Sudha Sutariya and Dr Rekha Rani Bhivapurkar. Then, NMC's town planning department prepared a proposal dated December 14, 2009, to grant TDR for Sonegaon lake. The department was aware that TDR cannot be granted for a lake, on which one cannot build a structure. Therefore, the department prepared the proposal to grant TDR by showing the lake to be heritage land, since it was in the heritage list.

Interestingly, the TDR proposal was prepared for just 13.40 hectares of the total 16.42 hectares, despite documents like sale deed available to prove exact area of the lake. There has been no application from the third owner, Sadanand Thote, in the matter till date. Actually, Thote had purchased 0.81 hectare of Sonegaon lake from Sutariya on April 13, 1992.

Then municipal commissioner Aseem Gupta and other officials approved the proposal, and the department started calculating the quantum of TDR to be granted to the owners. However, the two owners objected to the value arrived at, and submitted a valuation report dated April 26, 2010. This calculated the lake's worth at Rs695.68 crore, including the lake bed, stone wall and excavation value.

Amid this dispute, Gupta was transferred to Mumbai. On June 3, 2010, Sanjeev Jaiswal assumed charge as municipal commissioner and put the proposal on hold to look into the issue.

He handed over the case to additional deputy municipal commissioner Ravindra Kumbhare. "Kumbhare had good knowledge of land issues. He was shocked to learn about the TDR proposed for a lake. NMC was bound to follow the high court deadline, therefore he sent a letter to the government on December 26, 2011, asking whether TDR may be given. The government wrote back on February 13, 2012, to say TDR may not be granted to Sonegaon lake as it was a water body, said the sources.

This, Jaiswal and Kumbhare's caution saved NMC from severe strictures in the case. Interestingly, the NMC letter to the government mentions the area of the lake to be acquired as 15.21 hectares.

Later, Jaiswal prepared a proposal to acquire the lake and NMC's general body approved it on April 30, starting the acquisition process. Thus, NMC's wrong proposal delayed the acquisition of Sonegaon lake, giving a headache to NMC as well as the lake owners.

A senior NMC official said NMC proposed TDR to save money. "It does not cost anything to grant TDR while NMC will have to pay for land acquisition. We did not know TDR cannot be granted for a lake," he said.Now, NMC is again in the midst of a controversy for preparing a proposal to acquire the lake with a discrepancy of three acres.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 04 September 2012 07:17
 


Page 67 of 328