Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Urban Planning

No highrises on plots less than 1,000 sq m in area

Print PDF

Indian Express   24.05.2010

No highrises on plots less than 1,000 sq m in area

Sharvari Patwa Tags : real estate Posted: Mon May 24 2010, 04:13 hrs

 Mumbai:  Guidelines : Committee submits draft to Municipal Commissioner

The technical committee for highrise buildings has decided not to consider any proposals for a high rise on a net plot area of less than 1,000 sq m. It has submitted its draft guidelines for such buildings to the Municipal Commissioner.

The seven-member committee, chaired by former Chief Justice BV Chavan, has decided to follow the proposed guidelines, particularly the one regarding net plot area, hereafter. “Earlier, there were no set norms regarding the net plot area for highrises,” Chavan said. “Though we will now give clearances only under the new guidelines, we are just a recommendation committee and the ultimate power lies with the administration.”

Chief Fire Officer Uday Tatkare said a highrise building on a smaller plot meant many safety norms were compromised with, especially those on fire safety. “Usually, there are two staircases, one fire lift, one stretcher lift, etc which are needed for highrise buildings.” He said the buildings that come up for approval with lesser net plot area could not necessarily fulfill all the safety requirements.

The committee, comprising officials from the civic development plan department, fire department, MPCB, private architects and structural, civil and soil engineers from IIT and VJTI, was formed in July 2004 to vet proposals for highrises and its brief is to examine the structural stability of a highrise building and its overall effect on the neighbouring environment, roads and infrastructure.

Under the definition, a highrise is any building over 70 m in height (approximately 20 storeys). The proposals for a 200-odd metre high residential building, owned by Picadilly Estate, on a 539-sq m plot in Malabar Hill and a 101-metre-high residential-cum-commercial building on a 290-sq m plot are among those with less than a plot area of 1,000 sq m already cleared by the committee.

As on April 19, 2010, the committee has received 218 proposals, of which 155 were cleared. The highrise proposals cleared include a 300-m-high residential building at Shree Ram Mill and another 305-m-high residential building near Marine Lines.

A member said the committee used to get highrise proposals on really small areas as there was no specific parameter on the net plot area; and it was asked to clear them. “As the builders will in one way or other fulfill the safety requirements, there was not much we could do. But now, there can be a blanket ban on any plot with area less than 1,000 sq m.”

Upshot for cluster housing
As per the new guidelines, more space needs to be provided on the side areas of highrises while the road adjacent needs to be wider. And this means highrises can only be built on larger plots. In certain areas of Mumbai, especially the old city, small plots will have to be combined for building such high rises.

The cluster approach is largely applicable to cessed buildings in the island city, but it also extends to include other buildings that are unfit for human habitation and slums on public lands prior to January 1, 1995. Most of these buildings are located in the island city that does not have much land available for new residential or commercial construction.

In cluster housing, the builders are provided incentive FSI that can be used for free sale. This encourages amalgamation of plots and deriving extra FSI from that. We had studied cluster housing approach in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Singapore and felt that this could be a better approach to redevelopment,” a committee member said.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 04:24
 

Engineering section of the corporation comes under fire

Print PDF

The Hindu     24.05.2010

Engineering section of the corporation comes under fire

Staff Reporter

Senior engineers in the Corporation asked to mend their ways


None of the chief engineers posted here has worked for longer than six months

Remarks of Principal Secretary become a hot topic of discussion in the Corporation


VIJAYAWADA: The State government has trained its guns on the “work culture” of those in the engineering section in Vijayawada Municipal Corporation (VMC). The engineering section has reportedly incurred the wrath of the Government as none of the chief engineers posted here has worked for longer than six months.

The senior engineers in the Corporation were threatened with transfer if they did not “shape up”, at a review meeting held by Municipal Administration and Urban Development (MAUD) Principal Secretary T.S. Appa Rao a few days ago. Giving a dressing down to senior officials, the Principal Secretary asked them to mend their ways and cooperate with the chief engineer posted here. Municipal Commissioner and about 30 officials including in-charge Chief Engineer, superintending engineer, and executive engineers attended the meeting. The remarks of the Principal Secretary have become a hot topic of discussion in corridors of the Corporation for obvious reasons. N. Durga Prasad, who worked here as Chief Engineer, reportedly dashed off a letter to the government about “work culture” here after he was transferred back to his parent department. The intelligence department also sent a report about the affairs here. Subsequently, the Chief Minister's office is learnt to have asked the municipal administration department to look into the issue, sources say.

The Corporation has had no full time chief engineer for the last couple of years. All the officers who have been posted left the job on one pretext or other.

The State government appointed N. Durga Prasad Chief Engineer of the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation (VMC) in September 2009.

The post of CE fell vacant after the last Chief Engineer T. Anjaneyulu was surrendered to his parent department in November 2008. In less than a week of assuming charge as Chief Engineer, K. Shiv Ram left the city without informing his higher-ups in 2008. He was appointed incharge CE after a gap of nearly six months in March 2008.

Last Updated on Monday, 24 May 2010 05:20
 

Zoo revamp: Heritage panel says rework enclosure layout to preserve green cover

Print PDF

Indian Express   21.05.2010

Zoo revamp: Heritage panel says rework enclosure layout to preserve green cover

Nitya Kaushik Tags : Byculla Zoo revamp, mumbai Posted: Fri May 21 2010, 23:36 hrs

 Mumbai:  A week after reviewing the high-profile Byculla Zoo revamp plan in a closed door meeting, the Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee (MHCC) shot a letter to the civic administration on Wednesday, specifying its objections and observations of the project.

The letter raised issues on the preservation of the botanical garden, calculation of green cover and maintenance of buffer area in the zoo. The letter stated, “...the best course of action would be to alter the existing animal enclosures in the way that does not invade the greenery so as to improve the condition of the animals and preserve the botanical garden as it exists today.” The committee suggested “eliminating a few of the other proposals for major alteration of the enclosure”.

Zoo officials said they were currently drafting a detailed reply which will be sent to the heritage panel next week.

The MHCC in its letter pointed out discrepancies in the percentage areas of pathway/roads, garden areas open to the public and those closed to public in the revamp plans. “The committee is quite concerned about the manner in which these percentages have been calculated as these are crucial,” the letter said. The MHCC maintained that the character and status of the Zoo premises as a botanical garden should be recognized, accepted and preserved by the BMC.

Discussing the letter, MHCC chairman Dinesh Afzalpurkar said on Thursday, “We have replied in detail to the revamp plan and are expecting the BMC to make the required changes to the original plans.”

 Meanwhile, zoo officials said, “The zoo has always been just a garden, never a botanical garden. Besides, we don’t want to hoodwink any authority, we want a heritage member as well as the Central Zoo Authority member to be a part of our revamp committee. They can monitor the entire makeover process.”

Last Updated on Friday, 21 May 2010 11:43
 


Page 234 of 328