Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Urban Planning

GHMC to inspect public buildings

Print PDF

The Hindu 10.02.2010

GHMC to inspect public buildings

Special Correspondent

After inspections, notices to be issued for rectification within 45-60 days

HYDERABAD: The GHMC has decided to inspect all buildings with public usage including hospitals, schools and commercial establishments of less than 15 metres height or less than five floors to check for fire and life safety features among them.

Hospital inspections are to begin from next week (February 15) and all buildings are to be covered divided into three stages.

The decision was a follow up to a meeting held last week attended by Commissioner Sameer Sharma, Director General State Disaster Response and Fire Services Aruna Bahuguna, District Medical & Health Officer (DMHO) Ch. Jaya Kumari and others, said Additional Director, Fire Prevention Wing, K. Jayaram Naik on Tuesday.

The meeting was held in the aftermath of fire mishap at Park Hospital in Somajiguda. The subsequent collapse of a building under construction at Narayanaguda too led to the inspection schedule announcement.

Mr. Naik said that after inspecting the existing buildings; notices would be issued for rectification of deficiencies within 45 days to 60 days. For hospitals, the inspection report furnishing deficiencies in fire and life safety measures would be handed over to DMHO.

She, in turn, will be issuing notices to owners of hospitals to take up preventive measures within 60 days failing which action is to be taken. Similarly, for education institutions, inspection report will be given to the respective district Collectors and District Educational Officers for pursuing the matter.

The Additional Director explained that the following buildings would be inspected: Stage I – all hospitals in buildings of less than five floors and up to 50 beds. Stage II- all malls, commercial buildings, marriage halls, shopping centres, departmental stores, hotels, lodges, bars & restaurants run in buildings of height of 10 metres to 15 metres or three to five floors. Stage III - all schools run from buildings of even two floors.

For hotels, lodges, bars and others, GHMC’s fire prevention wing itself will do the inspections and issue notices on the deficiencies unearthed to the owners. They too will be given 60 days to take up safety and preventive measures.

NOC mandatory

As for the new buildings where hotels, hospitals, lodges, bars, function halls, religious congregation facilities, etc., are to come up in structures of less than five floors, taking up a ‘No Objection Certificate’ (NOC) has been made mandatory to obtain the occupancy certificate from the Municipal Corporation.

Inspection schedule for hospitals is as follows: February 15 to 20, 75 buildings in L.B. Nagar, Dilshuknagar, Malakpet, Koti, Secunderabad , Uppal. From February 22 to 26, 155 in Hayathnagar, Kukatpally, Panjagutta, Gandhinagar, West Maredpally, Mehdipatnam. From March 1 to 6, 160 in Narayanguda, Kachiguda, Nampally, KPHB Colony and Himayathnagar.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 02:48
 

Shrinking 101-floor tower down to 80?

Print PDF

Hindustan Times 09.02.2010

Shrinking 101-floor tower down to 80?

The planned 101-floor tower at Wadala just got shorter.

Faced with an unresponsive real-estate market, the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority, which is building the tower, has decided to scale it down to 80 floors.

The MMRDA had initially planned to build the tower on 35 hectares of land at Wadala, spread on a 5.6 lakh sq mtr plot, with a minimum height of 530 mtr. In May 2009, the agency had called for joint bids to build the tower along with an Inter-State Bus Terminal, both to be built at Rs 4,128 crore, on a design-build-own-operate-transfer basis.

Three bids came in: Australian firm Hyder Consulting, Essar Realty along with a Dubai-based firm, and Reliance Infrastructure along with a Chinese partner. However, MMRDA is reportedly unhappy with the offers it has got so far, and has decided to call for fresh bids for the project.

To make the project more attractive – and therefore financially viable — the agency has also delinked the two projects — the bus terminal project is now pegged at Rs 300 crore.

MMRDA officials now working on the revised draft for the tower tender have also decided to lower the minimum height of the tower, from the earlier 530 mtr to a minimum of 300 mtr.

MMRDA has also scaled down the size of the area available for the tower, from 5.6 lakh sq mtr to 4.9 lakh sq mtr.

“We are working on fresh tenders for the project. Rather than aim for a 101-storey project, we are stipulating that the tower be a minimum of 80 floors,” a senior MMRDA official said on condition of anonymity.

MMRDA had earlier expected revenues of Rs 1,800 crore every year as rent, from space leased out in the tower.

 

GHMC is to blame

Print PDF

The New Indian Express 08.02.2010

GHMC is to blame


AP Builder’s Forum: The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) is to be blamed for the building mishap, as it simply failed to check for its structural stability.

It is the duty of GHMC officials to carry out inspections of structures under construction. In the absence of this, small-time builders and owners get away with substandard construction.

It is understaffing in the engineering wing that has come in the way of the GHMC fulfilling its statutory role.

The engineers available are themselves busy in civic works, and little time is available for other duites such as structural assessments. Nevertheless, the civic body, which collects large sums as building fee, is duty-bound to appoint adequate staff for the purpose.

After the tragedy at least, the GHMC should wake up to its obligations. An exclusive cell should be established to carry out random checks on quality of materials and works.

The policy of allowing construction of additional floors in lieu of land acquisition for road-widening is egregious.

Instead, the landowner should either be compensated at market value or an alternative site provided.

If the GHMC does not have enough structural engineers to check the stability of under-construction buildings, they should empanel more licensed structural engineers and avail themselves of their services.

Before collecting the building fee from the owners or the builders, the civic body should levy a fee of say Rs 2,000 per per floor for structural stability tests by the empanelled engineers.

Because of the huge investments involved, big builders and developers are taking precautions and extra care in getting their structures checked by empanelled engineers. The many newcomers foraying into construction would also do well to go in for third-party consultation on safety. As for the GHMC, it is not right to blame private parties, as it is collecting huge amounts from the end-user and so is duty bound to safeguard their interests.

And then there are some builders and developers who are misusing GOMs 86.

They first take up the construction and successfully get the mortgage released from the GHMC. After getting full control over the building, the owner/ builder takes up construction of additional floors in gross violation of permission and regulations.

Such violations happen only because the GHMC has failed in its duty of preventing them in the first place.

Last Updated on Monday, 08 February 2010 10:06
 


Page 259 of 328