Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Urban Planning

Six proposals for Puri, Capital approved

Print PDF

The New Indian Express 17.11.2009

Six proposals for Puri, Capital approved


BHUBANESWAR: The steering committee on urban development today approved six proposals worth Rs 334.31 crore for Bhubaneswar and Puri which have been included in the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNRUM).

The meeting presided over by Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik cleared a Rs 166.9 crore proposal for drinking water supply in Puri town. The projects included Rs 68.33 crore and Rs 71.82 crore for rainwater drainage in Bhubaneswar and Puri respectively.

Besides, for running bus services Rs 16.5 crore and Rs 3.3 crore have been proposed for Bhubaneswar and Puri respectively. The projects included development of slums at Gadhakana area in the capital city at a cost of Rs 7.46 crore.

While 50 standard and mini buses will be provided for Bhubaneswar, five standard and 20 mini buses will be pressed into service in Puri. Water from the Bhargavi river will be used for providing drinking water to Puri town.

Similarly, nine rainwater channels will be constructed in Bhubaneswar. Five drainage zone nullahs will be constructed in Puri.

A four-storey apartment having 192 dwelling units will be constructed in Gadhakan area as per the proposal. Other projects discussed included introduction of e-governance in all the urban bodies in phases, construction of houses for economically backward families and development of slum areas under the public-private partnership mode.

Among others, BJD MPs from Puri and Bhubaneswar, Pinaki Mishra and Prasanna Patsani, all the three MLAs from the capital city and senior officials attended the meeting.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 17 November 2009 10:57
 

The big Unitech myth explodes

Print PDF

The New Indian Express 17.11.2009

The big Unitech myth explodes



BHUBANESWAR: When the Delhi-based real estate giant Unitech offered a whopping Rs 210 cr to Bhubaneswar Development Authority (BDA) to develop 10.74 acres in Chandrasekharpur area of the city two years ago, everybody was stunned. While the Urban Development Department officials patted themselves for fetching such high returns to the government coffers, overnight real estate prices skyrocketed in the city. The cost of apartments became exorbitant and unaffordable to the ordinary people.

How far has this proposed development by Unitech progressed? Not a brick has been laid in the plot since then. The only development ever since was Unitech signing an agreement with BDA and paying Rs 52 cr as earnest money and security.

As everyone has been wondering why no progress has been made by Unitech so far, the November 12 advertisements by BDA inviting developers for a mega commercial and residential project on the same 10.74 acres has raised many an eyebrow. In fact, it has floated two advertisements __ one for the 10.74 acres land and another for 2.68 acres in Chandrasekharpur.

While the reserve price fixed for the bigger plot in the advertisement is Rs 211 cr, Rs 1 cr more than what Unitech had quoted, the reserve price for the smaller one is Rs 52.75 cr, Rs 75 lakh more than what Unitech has already paid to BDA.

What is happening? How can BDA invite fresh tenders for something which has already been settled? Why bids have been invited for 2.68 acres from within the 10.74 acres separately? Does this mean that the tie-up with Unitech is scrapped? If yes, have the terms and conditions of the agreement been adhered to? Information available with this paper indicates that the agreement with Unitech is not yet closed and the fresh bid is to bail out the Delhi-based real estate firm. Having offered a mind-boggling Rs 210 cr to BDA, Unitech realised its mistake very early and has been on the backfoot ever since.

As it was unable to undertake the project in view of the global recession and inclement market conditions, Unitech reportedly requested BDA to allow it to withdraw from the project and allocate land worth Rs 52 crore in proportion to the rate it had offered at Rs 210 cr which works out to 2.68 acres from the original plot of 10.74 acres. This request was approved by the BDA and explains why a separate advertisement was floated to develop the 2.68 acres. Does this mean the BDA is giving Unitech an opportunity to redeem its Rs 52 cr with a penalty of at least Rs 75 lakh? The question here is instead of going tough on Unitech for violating the agreement terms, why a circuitous route is being adopted to offer a bailout package? Not complying with any of the 11 parameters as outlined in the agreement would amount to default and make the company lose its earnest money and security. So, why is the BDA, which could help the State coffers with Rs 52 crore, working out a method so that Unitech does not lose the earnest and security money? Moreover, as per tender guidelines, if the highest bidder pulled out, the project must go to the next highest bidder. It now remains to be seen whether any developer participating in the fresh bids will do another Unitech.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 17 November 2009 10:51
 

Disaster Management

Print PDF

Indian Express 16.11.2009

Disaster Management

What’s your fascination with destroying the world?
I’m a filmmaker, I like fictional stories. I take a lot of inspiration from documentaries, from real-life survivors of disasters. A lot of qualities in us only come out in the face of disaster.

What was the idea behind 2012?
We wanted a peg on which to hang our contemporary Noah’s Ark fable and came across a book about the Mayan Calendar when we were researching a different project. The Mayan calendar is set to reach the end of its 13th cycle on December 21, 2012, and after that, there’s nothing.

Is this your biggest production?
2012 ended up being an enormous production, even by my scale. Every page of the script was a scene where one wondered just what I had in mind, because it seemed so ambitious, so huge. But on the set, I was never pulling my hair out.

How visually different is it going to be compared to your earlier spectacles Independence Day and Day After Tomorrow?
It was more of a challenge than ID and DAT. Also a little nerve wracking as a result. 2012 has the largest number of effects of any of my films, for sure, there are about 1300. For example, the first image that came into my head for 2012, which also ended up being the teaser - is the water coming over the mountains of the Himalayas. The sequence is an extraordinary piece of cinema - visually stunning and terrifyingly real.

John Cusack is a very unlikely hero of a disaster movie.
I was interested in him as a father. No matter what has happened he still wants to do the best that he can for his family because, in the end, that is the most important thing. And even though he has let them down in the past, he will be there for them when it counts. He fit the part perfectly.

Was getting finances tough?
People who read the script said this is undoable. And I said, but we’ll do it. I think it’s worth doing it because when you have something where you have an adrenaline rush, you are nervous about it, and that’s good.

New York and Los Angeles are cities often destroyed in your films. Which one is it this time?
Well it’s a global film. Twisters razed LA in The Day After Tomorrow and aliens did the honours in Independence Day. I wanted the world to be connected through this film. In fact there is a strong Indian connection in the movie where the US government is warned by leading scientists where the problem is discovered.

Haven’t you thought of sequels to your earlier blockbusters?
Not with the earlier films but the plan is to have a TV sequel to 2012 - that it is 2013 and it’s about what happens after the disaster. It is about the resettling of Earth. Harald Kloser (co-writer) and I came up with the idea and we have the luxury of having a producer on the film, Mark Gordon. We said to Mark, “Why don’t you do a TV show that picks up where the movie leaves off and call it 2013?” I think it will focus on a group of people who survived but not on the boats; maybe they were on a piece of land that was spared or one that became an island in the process of the crust moving.

Last Updated on Monday, 16 November 2009 11:25
 


Page 302 of 328