Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Tamil Nadu News Papers

Public opinion divided on ‘Pay and Park’ proposal

E-mail Print PDF

The Hindu         10.11.2014 

Public opinion divided on ‘Pay and Park’ proposal

The six-hour rule is unfair, say some residents while many welcome the proposal

The introduction of 'pay and park' system is expected to regulate two-wheeler parking in the shopping areas of Tiruchi.— PHOTO: R.M. RAJARATHINAM
The introduction of 'pay and park' system is expected to regulate two-wheeler parking in the shopping areas of Tiruchi.— PHOTO: R.M. RAJARATHINAM

Even as the Tiruchirappalli City Corporation decided to implement the “pay and park” system for private vehicles in a few places of the city, it has evoked mixed reaction from the people.

Though the system is in force at the Central Bus Stand, where a shelter has been provided to park two-wheelers, it is for the first time that the corporation has come out with a plan to collect fee for parking two-wheelers in open spaces.

As per the proposal, which was approved by the council members at a recent meeting, the fee is to be levied for vehicles parked on Thillai Nagar Main Road, Shastry Road, and Fort Station Road, all in Thillai Nagar, and E.V.R. Road-Vayalur Road near Puthur.

It plans to levy a fee of Rs. 3 for two-wheelers, Rs. 5 for four-wheelers such as cars and vans, and Rs. 10 for buses. The users will have to pay again if the parking period goes past 6-hours. It is aimed at raising Rs. 22 lakh a year through the levy of parking fee on roads.

However, there is no clear information on whether the corporation will provide shelter to the notified parking lots or not. Similarly, there is no clarity on who will collect the fee, whether it will employ its own employees or auction it to private players.

While a section of people and road users welcomed the move, there are differing voices too. However, they are united on the demand that basic facilities, particularly a shed, should be provided at the lots.

“I personally welcome the move as it can regulate haphazard parking of vehicles on arterial roads and congested areas. But the motive should not be solely on generating revenue. The corporation should make it a model system by incorporating best practices,” says J. Madan Mohan of Cantonment.

He added that the corporation should carry out a detailed study at commercial zones, including Theppakulam, N.S.B. Road, Singarathope, and so on. Suitable locations should be identified. Pay and park system should be implemented in less traffic zones.

However, many are of the view that it is wrong on the part of TCC to levy parking fee when it doesn’t have parking policy. They say that notification on levying parking fee looks fanciful as there is no proper infrastructure in place. Some users point out the massive disparity in the parking fee collected at the central bus stand and the proposed fee for parking at open places. “The fee collected at central bus stand for parking is applicable for 24 hours. But levy at open places is applicable for just 6 hours. It is unfair,” says Santhanam of Ammayapillai Nagar.

 

Mayor inspects work at Siruthur tank

E-mail Print PDF

The Hindu           06.11.2014  

Mayor inspects work at Siruthur tank

Monsoon work:Mayor V.V. Rajan Chellappa and corporation officials inspecting work under way at Siruthur tank on Thursday.— Photo: S. James
Monsoon work:Mayor V.V. Rajan Chellappa and corporation officials inspecting work under way at Siruthur tank on Thursday.— Photo: S. James

Mayor V.V. Rajan Chellappa inspected Siruthur tank near Tiruppalai on Thursday and instructed officials to expedite the bund strengthening work.

According to a press release, the corporation, on receiving information that the tank is reaching its capacity after the rain, steps have been taken to prevent inundation of residential areas in the vicinity.

Along with the Public Works Department, the corporation was working to ensure that the water would not go waste and used for irrigation.

As per the State government’s instruction, repair work had been started after the monsoon, he said.

Assistant Commissioner A. Palanichamy and Executive Engineer Sekar were present during the inspection.

Last Updated on Monday, 18 July 2016 09:07
 

George Town buildings flout rules

E-mail Print PDF

The Hindu        06.11.2014 

George Town buildings flout rules

A number of structures constructed without building approval

A PIL was filed earlier, seeking a direction on illegal constructions in the locality in order to prevent fire accidents—Photo: R. Ragu
A PIL was filed earlier, seeking a direction on illegal constructions in the locality in order to prevent fire accidents—Photo: R. Ragu

: All buildings in George Town have been found in violation of development regulations, with most of the deviations found on higher floors.

Following a direction from the Madras High Court to the Chennai Corporation and Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) to file a report on unauthorised constructions in George Town, the civic body has done a preliminary screening of the buildings. This central business district has more than 14,000 buildings with around 25,000 property tax assessees.

The Corporation is likely to ask the owners of over 11,000 of the buildings in the area to submit the original building plan approved earlier. The CMDA is also likely to direct owners of around 3,000 structures, including multi-storeyed buildings, to produce the original plan approval.

The land use in George Town primarily comprises residential and mixed-residential zones. It is classified as a ‘continuous building area’, permitting structures of ground-plus-one floor, with a floor space index of 1.5.

Many of the owners have been found to have obtained permission for a building with ground-plus-one floor, but constructed multi-storeyed buildings. A number of the structures have been constructed without obtaining building approval from the civic body.

A few months ago, social activist K.R. Ramaswamy alias ‘Traffic’ Ramaswamy had filed a public interest litigation in the Madras High Court, seeking a direction to authorities with regard to illegal constructions in the locality in order to prevent fire accidents.

In his petition, Mr. Ramaswamy alleged ‘deliberate negligence’ on the part of the Corporation, traffic police, fire service and CMDA in preventing illegal structures from coming up.

Disaster management expert N. Mathavan said most of the roads are very narrow. “Fire tenders cannot reach a building in the event of a disaster. Vulnerability mapping for disaster management should be done in the area,” he said.

A former urban planning expert with CMDA, however, clarified that a question of violation would arise “only if construction is done newly”.

 


Page 135 of 1640