Urban News

The Hindu - Andhra Pradesh 11.08.2009

GHMC’s assurance on housing to sanitary staff

HYDERABAD: The GHMC has assured the National Commission for Safai Karmacharis that it would take up with the Hyderabad and Ranga Reddy district Collectorates the issue of allotting housing to sanitary staff from among the projects being taken up for the poor.

Special Commissioner M.T. Krishna Babu also offered to waive deposits sought from prospective Build, Own and Transfer (BOT) developer for constructing modern toilets if the application came from the sanitary groups concerned.

However, increasing the minimum wage from Rs. 3,900 was a policy decision to be taken by the government, he said.

Earlier, K.B. Krishna Murthy, Member, National Commission for Safai Karmacharis took up these issues with the officials after they were highlighted by sanitary staff at GHMC head office on Monday.

Later, talking to presspersons, Mr. Murthy praised the initiatives taken by the State government towards helping the safai karmacharis.

About 18 lakh have benefited from waiver of loans of less than Rs. 1 lakh amounting to Rs. 1,176.80 crore, he said.

The Hindu - Kerala 10.08.2009

Restriction on collection of parking fee

Staff Reporter

KOCHI: The Ombudsman for Local Bodies, M.R. Hariharan Nair, restricted the collection of parking fee by the Kochi Corporation from roads that do not belong to it.

The Ombudsman ordered that the restriction would be in force until the government makes any amendments to law or issues specific administrative direction as a temporary measure regulating collection of parking fee in roads not belonging to local bodies.

The order was issued while considering a petition filed by D.B. Binu, general secretary of the Human Rights Defence Forum, Kochi.

The Corporation had argued that Section 472 of the Kerala Municipality Act enabled it to collect fees irrespective of whether the road concerned belonged to it or not. The Public Works Department had objected to the Corporation collecting fee from roads which belonged to it. The Section 472 is something akin to the one for establishment and collection of fees for markets, where the Corporation provides facilities for marketing and provides space there for which the user pays fee. Here, the parking is not on land belonging to the Corporation. Corporation has neither purchased nor hired any land for facilitating parking. It has also not earmarked any land of its own for parking of vehicles and no service or facility is provided by the Corporation to the vehicle owner in the matter, the Ombudsman said.

The Ombudsman’s order, the complaint and the statements filed by the PWD and the Corporation should be forwarded to the Principal Secretary, Local Self Government Department, for issuing appropriate directions, which will be uniformly applicable to all local bodies, he directed.

If any amendment to Sec 472 or the Rule concerned or framing of new rules governing the matter is found necessary to enable collection of parking fee in areas that do not belong to the local body, it will be considered.

The Ombudsman directed the government to take a decision in three months.