Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Towns and Cities

Nearly half the population of State lives in urban areas: provisional data

Print PDF

The Hindu      20.07.2011

Nearly half the population of State lives in urban areas: provisional data

K. Venkataramanan

Urbanisation was the most significant between 1991 and 2001

Nearly half the population of Tamil Nadu live in urban areas, as the State continues to maintain its status as one of the country's most urbanised ones. Provisional data released by the Census Directorate based on the 2011 headcount shows the State's urban population stands at 48.45 per cent, whereas the figure was 44.04 per cent in the 2001 census.

The figure represents a 10 per cent increase in the urban component of the population in the last decade. The national average of urban residents is 31.16 per cent.

The State's population is 7,23,38,958, of which 3.71 crore people live in rural areas (51.55 per cent) and 3.49 crore in urban areas.

There has been only a 6.49 per cent growth in the rural population since 2001, whereas the urban population has gone up by 27.16 per cent, indicating the high level of urbanisation going on in the State.

Urbanisation in Tamil Nadu was the most significant in the decade between 1991 and 2001, when the urban population went up from 34.15 per cent to 44.04 per cent.

Going by the latest census figures, Chennai, naturally, is 100 per cent urban, but Kanyakumari has thrown up a surprise by turning out to be the second most urbanised district, with 82.47 per cent of its people living in urban areas.

From 65.27 per cent in 2001, the southernmost district in the State has significantly increased its urban population and has outdone the more industrialised Coimbatore district, where the urban population has gone up from 70 per cent to 75 per cent in the last decade.

Chennai's neighbouring districts – Kancheepuram and Tiruvallur – have urban segments accounting for 63.59 per cent and 65.3 per cent respectively, and new entrants to the highly urbanised districts (urban population of more than 60 per cent) are Tirupur (61.48 per cent urban population) and Madurai (60.64 per cent).

“Migration towards cities and towns, where there are more economic and job opportunities, is the main reason behind such large scale urbanisation,” says M.G. Devasahayam, Managing Trustee of SUSTAIN, and a former urban administrator. Besides the availability of opportunities for skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled workers, the decline in agriculture also contributes to the phenomenon.

“Both push and pull factors are at work in Tamil Nadu, more than in any other State. Agriculture is no longer attractive, and scarcity of water and lack of remunerative prices are pushing people towards the cities, while the prospect of more opportunities in information technology and IT-related sectors and other services are pulling them,” he says.

However, such large scale urbanisation also brings with it the need for sustainable development and a comprehensive urban governance policy. “Urban management or governance and a philosophy of urban development are hardly given any attention,” laments Mr. Devasahayam. Much of the State's urban management policies revolve around catering to big players, but there has been very little development in terms of basic infrastructure for the low income population and the poor, he adds.

“It is time the State government seriously addressed this issue.”

 

Pudukottai village panchayat to be merged with municipality

Print PDF

The Hindu       11.07.2011

Pudukottai village panchayat to be merged with municipality

M.Balaganessin

Increase in number of wards as per population recommended

The State government has issued an order merging the Pudukottai village panchayat with the Pudukottai municipality and has also recommended an increase in the number of wards in proportion to population based on the 2001 census.

The Pudukottai municipality has 39 wards and the Pudukottai village panchayat, five wards. As per the 2001 census, the municipality accounted for a population of 1, 09,217 and the village panchayat, 17,000. After the proposed merger, the new municipality would have 42 wards. The decision to merge the village panchayat was taken based on the increase in the population strength of the village panchayat which has five wards.

An urgent meeting of the municipal council was convened today in which a few councillors voiced their objection over the decision. They said that the municipality should pay more attention in providing adequate civic facilities to the existing 39 wards, without expanding geographically.

S. Arumugam (Congress) said that before the merger, the municipality should ensure its capability in providing basic amenities to the residents, particularly underground drainage facility and drinking water supply.

Ibrahim Babu, another councillor, said that the 2001 census would not be relevant now in the wake of the 2011 census with an increase in population.

Nainar Mohamad, another councillor, said that the council would not be able to provide civic amenities, if the area increased without adequate representation for the voters.

K. Balakrishnan, Municipal Commissioner, clarified that the meeting was convened for ascertaining the council's views on the proposed merger.

The objections would be intimated to the State government for further action. He said that the proposed new municipality could have only 42 wards, as the total population after merger would be around 1.26 lakh. As per norms, a municipality with a population in the 1.15 lakh to 1.40 lakh could have only 42 wards.

Ramathilagam Udaiyappan, Municipal Chairperson, presided over the meeting.

 

Steps will be taken to improve municipal market, says chairman

Print PDF

The Hindu       01.07.2011

Steps will be taken to improve municipal market, says chairman

Special Correspondent

Contract given to private agency for maintaining streetlights will not be renewed

On civic amenities:Councillors making a point at the Udhagamandalam Municipal Council meeting on Thursday.—Photo: M. Sathyamoorthy

On civic amenities:Councillors making a point at the Udhagamandalam Municipal Council meeting on Thursday.—Photo: M. Sathyamoorthy

The Udhagamandalam Municipal Council, which met here on Thursday with the Chairman, R. Rajendran, presiding over it, decided to initiate steps forthwith to make the local municipal market consumer-friendly.

The decision followed a debate on a letter written by a local advocate N. Narayanan Kutty in his capacity as a citizen of this hill station.

While referring to certain shortcomings in the market, the letter addressed to the Chairman, the Nilgiris Collector and the Superintendent of Police pointed out inter alia that though it has been designed to facilitate only the movement of pedestrians, two-wheelers belonging to some of the traders were freely moving inside with scant regard to the safety of people.

The boxes attached to the rear of the two-wheelers pose a serious threat to the pedestrians in general and children in particular.

Pointing out that most of the vacant space has been occupied by encroachers, he regretted that the authorities concerned are turning a blind eye to this serious violation of rules.

Underscoring the need to set right matters and post police personnel who are capable of keeping at bay the anti-social elements who are flouting the rules, he said that if a reply was not given within 30 days, he would be forced to file a Public Interest Litigation.

Stating that due importance would be given to the grievances of the public which had been highlighted in the letter, Mr. Rajendran said that remedial measures would be taken without delay.

The Vice-Chairman, J. Ravikumar (DMK), said that action should be taken to remove encroachments without bias.

Responding to complaints relating to distribution of water, the Chairman said that there was sufficient water in most of the reservoirs, particularly the Parsons Valley Hydel Reservoir.

In protest against the delay in taking up development works in their wards, a few councillors, including Sampath (Independent),Vinodha (Congress) and Ravi (DMK), sat on the floor. Mr. Vishwanath (DMDK) said that the increasing number of potholes in Bombay Castle area was a source of concern.

The Chairman said that a sum of Rs. 1 crore would be sought from the general fund of the municipality to take up urgent works in all the wards. He added that the contract given to a private agency for maintaining streetlights here will not be renewed.

Following a heated exchange of words with Imtiaz (AIADMK) over what kind of issues should figure in the council meetings, all the DMK members, including the Vice-Chairman staged a walk out.

Last Updated on Friday, 01 July 2011 04:36
 


Page 121 of 275