Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Towns and Cities

Contractor assaulted on corporation premises

Print PDF

The Hindu 29.04.2010

Contractor assaulted on corporation premises

Special Correspondent

He had gone there to submit tender documents

TIRUCHI: Tense moments prevailed at the Corporation office campus in the city on Wednesday morning after a contractor was assaulted by a group of persons when he came to submit supporting documents for an e-tender.

The incident took place even as the Corporation Council meeting was under way and right in front of a large number of women, who had turned up at the office to appear for interviews for the post of noon meal organisers, and a police team posted at the Corporation Office right from morning.

The contractor, Subramanian, sustained injuries and has been admitted to the Annal Gandhi Memorial Government Hospital.

Mr.Subramanian was allegedly assaulted by supporters of another contractor, who is a local office-bearer of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, following a dispute over bidding for the Anna Nagar Link Road project, to be executed at an estimated cost of over Rs.3 crore.

Mr.Subramanian was allegedly asked not to bid for project by the rival group and was assaulted when he turned up at the Corporation office today. Another group intervened on behalf of Mr.Subramanian to launch a counter-attack against the assailants, as the terrified women and onlookers ran helter skelter.

Last Updated on Thursday, 29 April 2010 05:20
 

Oppn. councillors held during protest at Corpn.

Print PDF

The Hindu 24.04.2010

Oppn. councillors held during protest at Corpn.

Special Correspondent

They block Mayor's vehicle; demand spl. meeting to discuss Ammankulam issue

— Photo: S.Siva Saravanan

In one voice: Councillors of Opposition parties in the Coimbatore Corporation block Mayor R. Venkatachalam's vehicle at the civic body's main office in the city on Friday.

COIMBATORE: Six out of the 21 councillors removed from the Coimbatore Corporation premises by the police during a protest, were arrested on four charges that included criminal intimidation and causing hurt.

They were P. Rajkumar, M. Natarajan, R. Prabakaran (all of them from the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam), K. Purushothaman (Communist Party of India), N. Thangavelu (Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam) and Independent member M.S. Velmurugan.

Corporation North Zone Chairman and Communist Party of India (Marxist) member C. Padmanabhan and Education Committee Chairman and CPI member R. Kalyanasundaram were among the rest 15 who were let off in the night.

The police removed the councillors from the Corporation premises following pandemonium at the Urgent Meeting of the Council over the sinking of a tenement that was being constructed at Ammankulam for slum dwellers.

They wanted a reply from Mayor R. Venkatachalam on their demand for a special meeting on the tenements issue. On not getting it, they staged a protest in the Council and later in front of the main building of the Corporation. They sat in front of the Mayor's vehicle and declared that they would give way for it only if he acceded to their demand.

The arrested councillors were charged under the following sections of the Indian Penal Code: 143 (unlawful assembly), 341 (wrongful confinement), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 506 (i) (criminal intimidation) and remanded to custody.

The Council meeting was convened to approve various infrastructure development projects for the World Classical Tamil Conference. But, as soon as it began, these councillors rose to demand a special meeting of the Council to discuss the Ammankulam issue.

This was the second meeting at which the demand was made. At an earlier meeting, the councillors were told that this issue could not be discussed as it was not listed in the urgent meeting's agenda. The Corporation had maintained that the tenements at Ammankulam were being constructed by the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board. Therefore, it would be inappropriate on the part of the Corporation to discuss it.

But, when the agitating councillors insisted that the Mayor should respond to their demand first, the Congress and the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam members wanted the meeting to be conducted. When Congress Floor Leader R.S. Thirumugham began reading a Thirukural couplet, the protesting Opposition members crowded around the Mayor's chair to press their demand. The anti-untouchability pledge was drowned in slogan shouting. But, the Congress and DMK members approved all the 12 subjects listed in the agenda.

This was the second consecutive urgent meeting of the Council to last only for five minutes, and for the same reason.

As the Mayor reached the exit, the protesting councillors stood in his way and demanded his response to their demand for a special meeting. The Congress and DMK members stepped in to enable him get out of the Council, but only after some tense moments.

The agitated councillors tried to catch up with him while he made his way to the office. But, they were stopped by the police. A few minutes later, the councillors squatted in front of the Mayor's car and declared that they would allow him to leave the Corporation only if he replied to their written request for a special meeting. After nearly an hour, a written complaint by the Mayor to the city police led to the removal of the councillors.

The Mayor alleged in the complaint that Mr. Rajkumar, Mr. Padmanabhan, Mr. Purushothaman, Mr. Velmurugan and others disrupted the reading of the anti-untouchability pledge and this amounted to an insult to the Constitution of India.

Mr. Venkatachalam accused Mr. Rajkumar of criminal intimidation and councillors M. Natarajan, R. Prabhakaran, Mr. Velmurugan and Mr. Thangavelu of attempting to assault him.

The Mayor accused these councillors of conspiring to assault him under the leadership of Mr. Rajkumar. Leader of the Opposition and DMK member V.N. Udayakumar sustained an injury while trying to prevent this, the Mayor alleged in the complaint.

Last Updated on Saturday, 24 April 2010 07:30
 

Civic body told to hold public hearing

Print PDF

Deccan Chronicle 23.04.2010

Civic body told to hold public hearing

April 23rd, 2010
April 22: The Madras High Court has directed the Chennai corporation to hold a public hearing on April 30 with regard to the construction of an underground multi-level car parking lot in T Nagar.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice H.L. Gokhale and Justice V. Dhanapalan posted to June 14 further hearing of the petition filed by R. Chandran, a resident of the area, seeking that the government be restrained from constructing the underground car park in the Corporation playground on Venkatanarayana Road in T Nagar.

“When the matter was taken up on Thursday, additional advocate general P. Wilson, on instructions from the government, agreed that a public hearing would be provided for,” the bench said. “The corporation is directed to issue an advertisement in an English and Tamil daily on or before April 24 stating that the public hearing will be held at a community centre in that area on April 30 or if required, on any subsequent date.”

“The corporation will submit its report after the hearing on June 14, by which time, the hearing will be completed. In the meanwhile, the status quo already granted will continue,” the bench added. The Chennai Corporation, in its counter, stated that the existing playground will not be affected due to the project.

‘Don’t insist on PAN numbers’
The Madras high court has directed the Union government not to insist that two non-banking financial institutions quote the permanent account numbers (PAN) of their depositors on form 15G/15H. It has asked that the Centre deduct TDS on interest paid by the depositors subject to the condition that they submit form 15G/15H with a declaration of their status as non-assessees.

Justice Chitra Venkataraman posted to June 17 further hearing of petitions filed by Shriram City Union Finance Limited and Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd, Chennai, seeking that section 206AA of the Income Tax Act be declared ultra vires.

Section 206AA requires investors to furnish PAN on form 15G to avoid TDS and consequently requires financial institutions to quote the number. Accepting the arguments of the counsel for the petitioners, the judge said, “Considering the practical difficulties in getting a PAN in respect of non-assessees, this court is satisfied with the prima facie case made by the two institutions.”

* Consult panchayat to set up waste plant
The Madras high court has held that the Kuthamba-kkam panchayat must be consulted before the proposed solid waste management facility (SWMF) is established at Kuthambakkam village.

A division bench comprising Justices Elipe Dharma Rao and K.K. Sasidharan disposed of petitions filed by S. Nandakumar and the Kuthambakkam panchayat, challenging the establishment of the SWMF on a 65 acre plot in the Kuthambakkam village panchayat area. The bench made it clear to the government that before taking action, the panchayat concerned should be consulted in accordance with Section 134(3) of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act.

It said the panchayat wo-uld have to be taken into co-nfidence in view of the larger public interest.

 


Page 193 of 275