Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Towns and Cities

Municipal officials walk out of council meeting

Print PDF

The Hindu 06.02.2010

Municipal officials walk out of council meeting

Staff Reporter

DINDIGUL: For the first time, municipal officials, led by Commissioner R. Lakshmi, walked out of the council meeting here on Thursday protesting sarcastic remarks made by an AIADMK member.

Later, the officials staged a demonstration before the municipality condemning his remarks.

The Commissioner also announced that no official would take part in the council meeting in future, if the councillor concerned refused to tender an apology.

Earlier, Vice-Chairman V. Kalyanasundaram too staged a walk out condemning the failure of the Council to conduct the meeting properly.

The meeting was presided over by Municipal Chairman R. Natarajan.

At the outset, AIADMK Councillors condemned the inordinate delay in commencing the meeting.

The chairman narrated his critical condition and asked officials to proceed. But AIADMK members wanted to know the reason behind delay in the completion of the underground drainage project.

When Mr. Kalyanasundaram attempted to talk on a subject, the Chairman advised the announcer to read the subjects continuously.

AIADMK councillor Ramu Thevar retorted: “Whether the council meeting will be conducted in a democratic way or not.”

In a fit of anger, the Vice-Chairman flayed that the council was not conducted properly and walked out of the hall along with CPI(M) councillor K. Mariammal.

A wordy duel between the AIADMK and DMK councillors rocked the hall. Brushing aside the chaotic situation, the Chairman resumed the discussion.

While making a series of corruption charges against the Municipality in connection with the laying of roads and underground drainage project, Mr. Thevar cautioned that the council would have to face the wrath of the people.

Another AIADMK councillor T. Jayabal wished to know whether the Chairman had powers to use the money allotted for one project for implementation of another project.

The Chairman replied that he had powers to use it if necessary.

Mr. Jayabal queried how the Council would sanction two schemes for laying a single road between Sri Vellai Vinayagar Temple and Periyar Statue.

Mr. Thevar shouted that Council had been making blunders and officials were supporting it.

“We will go for a CBI inquiry. At that time, officials will go to prison.”

Last Updated on Saturday, 06 February 2010 01:46
 

More area of Pallikaranai marsh to be protected

Print PDF

The Times of India 05.02.2010

More area of Pallikaranai marsh to be protected

CHENNAI: After taking a policy decision to hand over 150 hectares of land in Pallikaranai to the forest department, the state government will take steps to acquire patches of land in the northern and south-eastern parts of the marsh, measuring about 127 hectares, to protect one of the last remaining ecosystems in the city from becoming an open dumpyard.

Spread over 5,000 hectares at the time of Independence, nearly 90% of the marshland was lost as Chennai city expanded. In 2002, the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, alarmed at the rate at which the marshland was shrinking, commissioned a study to find out the area of the marsh, its habitat quality and suggested interventional methods.

The survey revealed the presence of 275 species of flora and over 100 bird species in the marsh. In late 2005, the government constituted a high-level committee to look into the matter and the next summer the locals formed an environment committee to protect the wetland.

The first real effort to protect the marshland came on April 9, 2007, when the state declared 317 hectares of the marsh as a reserve forest. The Kancheepuram district authorities handed over the land to the forest department. But scientists and researchers involved in the protection of the marsh argued that an additional 150 hecatres on both sides of the Thoraipakkam-Tambaram road bisecting the marsh should also be declared a reserve forest area as birds, especially several varieties of ducks, came there for feeding.

“It’s a miracle that the birds still visit the marsh despite the non-stop dumping by the city corporation,” says Ranjit Daniels, an ornithologist who conducted the first scientific bird census in the state last month. According to official statistics, the dumpyard, in the absence of source segregation of waste, is eating into four hectares of marshland every year.

Afraid that the growing garbage mounds will obstruct flow of water from north to south, the government has now directed the civic body to hand over the 150 hectares to the forest department.

Peoples’ participation, sustained media support and a responsive government has been the hallmark of the save Pallikaranai campaign, a rare success story in protecting an ecologically-sensitive environment despite urban pressures. Not many know that the marsh extends up to Sholinganallur Road, says Jayashree Vencatesan of Care Earth. “Over 100 hecatres on the northern side of the marsh (adjacent to Velachery-Tambaram road) and another patch on the south-east should be merged with the reserve forest to protect the marsh in its totality,” says Jayashree.

Senior forest officials said there was a proposal to turn the Pallikaranai marsh into a wetland centre by networking with international agencies to attract funds for its protection and restoration.
 

State govt ordered to pay Rs 1 lakh compensation

Print PDF

The New Indian Express 05.02.2010

State govt ordered to pay Rs 1 lakh compensation


CHENNAI: While officials defend the government, any deviation from facts would amount to filing a false statement and result in interference with the administration of justice, the Madras High Court has observed.

“They should also not forget that every law abiding citizen expects that justice alone must win and any attempt to tamper with the judicial process would necessarily result in destroying the very judicial system,” a division bench comprising justices D Murugesan and PPS Janarthana Raja, observed recently.

The bench held the government responsible for the filing of incorrect statements before various courts by two IPS officers — TK Rajendran and Pholonath — who were either retired or transferred later, in a matter relating to promotion of a head constable attached to the Anna Salai police station to the post of sub-inspector and directed it to pay a compensation of Rs 1 lakh to the victim on or before March 15.

In his contempt application, G Rajaram sought punishment for the two police officers for not complying with the directions of the High Court dated July 14, 2009, with regard to his promotion as S-I and sought a compensation of Rs 50 lakh.

Disposing of the application, the bench observed that Rajaram had suffered a lot for years because of the incorrect statements given by the officers during the earlier rounds of litigation. Had they not furnished incorrect affidavits, he would have been promoted as S-I in 1998, itself.

The petitioner was made to undergo the ordeal physically, mentally and financially. Since the officers were in charge during the relevant period, but had either retired or were transferred later, the State alone was liable to pay the compensation, the bench added.

Last Updated on Friday, 05 February 2010 08:21
 


Page 207 of 275