Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Towns and Cities

The good, bad & ugly

Print PDF

The Times of India 19.09.2009

The good, bad & ugly

CHENNAI: There is plenty of action on the fabled sands of the Marina. Dozens of construction workers are busy giving final shape to beautifying the world’s second longest beach. Just a stone’s throw away, close to the coastline, tens of hundreds of families live in appalling conditions — crowded tenements in a thickly-polluted area.

Once the multi-crore rupee beautification project, presently in full swing, is complete, the Marina will resemble a plush open-air mall — complete with parking spaces, toilets, a play area for children, garbage bins, a food court, lawns, galleries, fountains and ornamental lights.

“The works involve enormous amounts of tax payers’ money with no matching benefits to the environment, while local fisherfolk continue to be exposed to unhygienic atmosphere,” says T Mohan, advocate and activist. Sample this: The stretch between the Light House and Foreshore Estate, comprising several fishing colonies, is littered with tonnes of plastic waste uncleared for months. The city’s coastline stretches for around 25.6 km — roughly 2.5% of the state’s coastline.

According to fishermen, every day, at least one of them is injured by broken pieces of bottles thrown carelessly on the beach by visitors and left uncleared. “Moreover, the tonnes of plastic waste endangers the safety and livelihood of the fisherfolk but no agency cares to pay a visit to clean the mess,” says M Jayaraj of Mullaima Nagar. The conservancy staff do clean the service road daily but take no pains to clear the waste from the footpaths and the sandy area.

The overflowing garbage from the bins, woefully inadequate for a population of 10,000 families, often ends up on the sands. There are only a couple of public toilets but plenty of fisherfolk colonies — Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Mullaima Nagar, Nambikkai Nagar, Bhavani Kuppam, Duming Kuppam and Nochi Kuppam. Worse, the toilets are either unusable or have remained locked for years. So, men, women and children of the colonies use the beach as an open toilet.

The clogged sewer chambers of the slum clearance board tenements in Duming Kuppam have resulted in a puddle of dirty water on the service road. Locals have preferred several complaints but the situation has not improved much in the last two months. The recent rains compounded the problem with the sewage flowing on to the sands. “The situation will worsen in the coming days if things do not improve,” says S Somu, a vegetable vendor.

The locals dismiss the corporation’s claim of periodical clean-ups of the sands. The lone sand siever machine covers the Marina and Elliots Beach every three days but the stretch near Srinivasapuram is never touched, they complain. “It will spoil the fishing equipment kept on the sands,” says a corporation official. The local body has plans to float a tender for a sand siever at Rs 53 lakh soon, but it will be confined to the Marina and the Elliots beach.

“This is sheer indifference of officialdom. A responsible government should provide better living conditions for the poor instead of coming up with proposals such as an elevated corridor along the coast,” says G Devasahayam, a former bureaucrat and founder-trustee of SUSTAIN, a non-governmental organisation.
 

Multi-storeyed buildings zones in other cities to be studied

Print PDF

The Hindu 19.09.2009

Multi-storeyed buildings zones in other cities to be studied

 

Special Correspondent


All areas along 60 ft roads can be declared MSB zones, says Commissioner, Town Planning, Chennai

 

Publish the new Master Plan for Coimbatore after getting public opinion, says RAAC


Photo: S. Siva Saravanan

HIGH-RISE ZONE?: D.B. Road is one of the main roads in the city listed for categorisation as multi-storeyed buildings area. –

Coimbatore: The Coimbatore Corporation will study the system adopted in other cities in the State for declaring multi-storeyed building zones before implementing it in Coimbatore city.

This decision was taken at an all-party meeting held at the Corporation on Thursday.

Among other proposals, the meeting was convened to also discuss the one for declaring areas along more than 60 roads in the city as MSB zones.

This proposal was placed in the Corporation Council on September 11 for its approval.

But, it ran into resistance from a section of the councillors, chiefly those belonging to the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and those in the Town Planning Committee.

The members wanted to know why the proposal was placed in the Council directly without routing it through the committee.

Allegation

When they alleged attempts to get approval for the proposal without discussions involving elected representatives, Corporation Commissioner Anshul Mishra explained that it was placed in the Council only to enable all the councillors to take part in the discussion on the proposal.

Mr. Mishra also pointed out that this was not the final list and that the suggestions of the councillors could be considered.

This was why the proposal was placed in the Council, he said.

The Commissioner also said that a survey could be done to identify more places that could be added to the list.

The Commissioner of Town Planning in Chennai had in a letter to the Commissioner said that all areas along 60 ft roads could be declared MSB zones.

This decision was taken following a representation from the Coimbatore Property Developers’ Association.

The Commissioner of Town Planning had asked the Corporation Commissioner to submit a list of such roads. Accordingly, the Corporation identified 64 roads. These included key roads such as Tiruchi Road, Cross-Cut Road, D.B. Road, 100 Feet Road, Thadagam Road, Perur Road, Sivananda Colony Road, Dr. Nanjappa Road, State Bank Road, V.K.K. Menon Road, Raja Street and Pollachi Road.

Move welcomed

The Residents’ Awareness Association of Coimbatore (RAAC) has welcomed the Government decision to permit multi-storeyed buildings zones.

Honorary secretary of RAAC R.R. Balasundaram said that since its inception, RAAC had been requesting the Corporation, Local Planning Authority and the State Government to permit multi-storeyed buildings only along roads that were 40 ft wide and above.

Draft rules

“In this regard, we have prepared a detailed draft building rules and submitted these to the Government. But, till date no steps have been taken on the revised DCR and Master Plan for Coimbatore, which are a need of the hour,” he said.

“We welcome this announcement and request the [Corporation] Commissioner not to permit construction on narrow roads. We also request the Government to publish the new DCR and Master Plan for Coimbatore after getting public opinion,” Mr. Balasundaram said.

Last Updated on Saturday, 19 September 2009 01:07
 

Bench upholds flyover notification

Print PDF

The Hindu 19.09.2009

Bench upholds flyover notification

 

Special Correspondent

Single judge found no justification for invoking urgency clause

Photo: S.R. Raghunathan

Work on the flyover is likely to be expedited. —

CHENNAI: The Madras High Court on Friday allowed appeals by the Chennai Corporation and the State, challenging a single Judge’s order quashing a notification relating to the construction of a flyover at the junction of Cenotaph Road and Turnbulls Road on the ground that there was no justification for invoking the urgency clause.

In its order, a Bench, comprising Chief Justice H.L. Gokhale and Justice D. Murugesan, said that the acquisition of land was only to an extent of 18,225 sq. feet. Only the compound walls of the buildings belonging to landowners, two pump rooms, a generator room, a ground floor, dining hall of a hotel, a sweet shop, and a ground floor shop constructed without authorisation were to be demolished.

The service lanes were absolutely necessary for the free flow of traffic once the flyover was constructed. These parallel service lanes would be indispensable to the neighbours for access to their premises, and they could not have any grievance over the notification of the urgency clause. In that context, the dispensation of enquiry could not be found fault with.

The Bench said that in its opinion, even if there were certain non-compliance of the guidelines, the court should desist from interfering with the acquisition proceedings initiated for a definite public purpose. Consequently, the Bench said it should necessarily uphold the notification.

The government had issued a notification under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring land for the flyover. It had invoked the urgency clause. By the same notification, it had also dispensed with the enquiry.

These were challenged. A single Judge, in an order issued in May this year, had quashed the notification on the ground that there was no justification for invoking the urgency clause.

Last Updated on Saturday, 19 September 2009 01:03
 


Page 245 of 275