Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Civic body orders removal of shops near war memorial

Print PDF

The Times of India                28.02.2013

Civic body orders removal of shops near war memorial

TRICHY: The Trichy corporation in a special meeting held on Wednesday ordered to remove five of the 25 shopping lots that served as an obstruction to the first World War memorial at the crowded Gandhi market area in the city. As many as 41 men from Trichy gave their lives for the country during the first World War between 1914 and 1919 and the memorial is believed to have been built in the early 1930s. It was completely encroached on all its sides by retail outlets and the corporation in the past had allegedly turned a blind eye to the memorial.

On January 24, TOI published a story highlighting how the war memorial had been vilified by a cluster of stalls. Many residents had forgotten the structure since it was almost lost in the thickness of the busy Gandhi market area. The issue was first brought to light by a brigadier during the gold jubilee celebrations of the territorial army on October 9, 2009. Later on, it was taken by the Ex-Servicemen's Welfare Association, which wrote a letter to the district collector Jayashree Muralidharan requesting her to ensure that the memorial was respected and the encroachments removed.

Since it concerned the jurisdiction of the city corporation, the collector wrote to the civic body, but even then things did not move in the right direction. An official from the Trichy corporation even went to the extent of saying that since the war memorial had been built prior to 1994 when Trichy became a corporation, it did not concern it directly. When the issue was brought to the notice of the incumbent corporation commissioner V P Dhandapani, he assured that he would do the needful.

The commissioner admitted that the place was not maintained during the last decade and said, "the honour of the men who laid their lives for the country is important than the rent collected from the five shops." Dhandapani further said on Wednesday that he would not do the mistake of evicting the five persons abruptly but serve them three months notice. "When you remove them abruptly, they go to the court and there is every likelihood that they might get a ruling in their favour. As such, I am going by the rule book and will remove them accordingly," he said.
Last Updated on Thursday, 28 February 2013 12:02