Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Urban Planning

Civic body warns of action against plan violations

Print PDF

The Hindu                       20.02.2013

Civic body warns of action against plan violations

Special Correspondent

Violations in buildings constructed prior to July 2007 can get exemption.

With the State government issuing guidelines for granting exemption and regularising plan violations in buildings constructed before July 1, 2007, the Tiruchi Corporation has asked owners of such buildings to get their properties regularised.

The Corporation along with the Directorate of Town and Country Planning would initiate appropriate action and seal buildings that have not been regularised and also buildings, constructed after July 1, 2007, with plan deviations, Corporation Commissioner V.P.Thandapani has said. Buildings without proper parking space would also be sealed.

Licensed surveyors

Speaking at a consultative meeting with licensed surveyors in the city to brief them on the government guidelines for regularisation of plan violations in buildings constructed prior to July 1,2007, Mr.Thandapani instructed Corporation engineers and the licensed surveyors to extend proper guidance to building owners on the guidelines issued by the government for the regularisation.

As per the guidelines issued by the government, plan deviations relating to floor space index, road or street width violations, front, rear and side setback violations in buildings constructed prior to July 1, 2007 would be regularised subject to various conditions and on payment of the stipulated fee.

The extent of violation in respect to minimum required road width should not exceed 20 per cent. Front, rear and side setback violations should not exceed 50 per cent of the required minimum. Similarly, floor space index should not exceed 50 per cent of the maximum allowed limit.

The government has also stipulated the rate of fee for grant of the exemption for various types of buildings.

No building with any encroachment including aerial encroachment on to a public road or street or on a poramboke land or on local authority lands, open space and recreational areas, water bodies and land affected by the erstwhile Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978( Tamil Nadu Act 24 of 1978) will be considered for exemption. No developments in the aquifer recharge area restricted for development shall be considered for exemption.

Applications with the specified documents and fee should be submitted to the competent authority, the Corporation or the Directorate of Town and Country Planning.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 11:06
 

Developers of middle-income housing to get incentives under new guidelines

Print PDF

The Hindu                    18.02.2013

Developers of middle-income housing to get incentives under new guidelines

Guidelines classify dwelling units intomiddle-income, low-income housingDevelopers who build MIG housing to be permitted to build 30 per cent extra
Guidelines classify dwelling units intomiddle-income, low-income housingDevelopers who build MIG housing to be permitted to build 30 per cent extra.

A year after the finance minister announced in the Tamil Nadu legislative assembly that the government would facilitate developers to build more low-income and middle- income group housing, norms have been framed to enable it.

According to the guidelines, which are under the final stages of review, apartments with dwelling units of 700 square feet, would be classified as middle-income group (MIG) housing.

Developers who build apartment complexes dedicated to MIG housing would be permitted to build 30 per cent more than what is currently allowed. The permissible FSI — floor space index, a ratio that determines the maximum buildable area in a given plot — is 1.5 in normal cases, but in apartments dedicated to MIG housing, it would be enhanced to 1.95.

However, a State government source said, the prices of these apartments would not be regulated to meet the affordability criteria as defined by the government of India. For middle-income groups, the price of the dwelling unit has to be less than five times the household’s annual gross income to remain in the affordability bracket.

The reasoning is that the higher FSI in itself would bring down the land cost of each unit, which on many occasions is as much as, if not more than, the construction cost. Secondly, the government thinks it would not be practical to regulate prices.

Responding to this proposal, K.P. Subramanian former professor of urban engineering, Anna University, said: “there is no guarantee that an increase in FSI will bring the price down. Price is determined by a complex set of factors. Second, alongside this FSI increase, investment and attention must be paid to improving infrastructure; otherwise we will only burden the city further.”

M.K. Sundaram, former chairman of the Builders Association of India, Southern Centre, said that “this is a welcome move as long as the increase in FSI is limited to the growing peripheries of the city.” Any increase within the city would affect existing infrastructure”. He also remarked that that “increasing the FSI would not necessarily bring down the selling price of an apartment.”Apartments with dwelling units of 500 sq. ft. are categorised as low-income group (LIG) housing and those with 300 sq. ft. are classified as economically weaker section housing (EWS).

In 2009, the government had enhanced the FSI for developers constructing LIG and EWS housing to 30 and 50 per cent respectively. However, this incentive did not attract many developers.

Last Updated on Monday, 18 February 2013 11:30
 

42 government buildings among 70 vying for heritage status

Print PDF

The Hindu                        14.02.2013

42 government buildings among 70 vying for heritage status

The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) is in the process of readying a list of important buildings for heritage conservation.

Later this month, CMDA will clear the first list of 70 heritage buildings compiled by the heritage conservation committee (HCC).

As many as 42 of the structures/precincts that figure on the list are government buildings, and the rest are private ones.

The government buildings include Anna University’s old engineering college, Government Teacher Training Institute – Saidapet, Madras High Court, Music and Dance College, King Institute of Preventive Medicine and General Post Office.

Theosophical Society is one of the private premises likely to figure on the list.

After the list is cleared by the CMDA later this month, objections, if any, from the owners of the buildings will be recorded at a meeting to be held at CMDA’s Egmore office.

“We will call the property owners and explain the significance of the structures with the help of documents that prove their heritage value,” said a senior official associated with the compilation of the list.

The CMDA will then send the list, along with its recommendations and recorded objections, to the State government for notification.

However, once a building is notified as a heritage structure, the onus of repair and maintenance will be on the property owners.

“The owners will have to preserve the heritage buildings,” the official said. They will be forbidden from demolishing the structures and in the case of any damage, repair the structures themselves.

A repair fund will be created and kept at the disposal of the member secretary of CMDA for partial funding of such repairs if the owner is unable to carry them out.

The listed buildings will have three grades.

Grade I structures will be prime landmarks upon which no alterations will be permitted.

Under Grade II, external changes on structures will be subject to scrutiny.

Buildings under Grade III may be changed for ‘adaptive reuse’ with suitable internal and external changes. The list of heritage buildings has been readied by a team of architecture students engaged by the CMDA under the HCC’s supervision.

The team inspected hundreds of heritage buildings and precincts in the city and documented them over the past few months.

It has also collected photographs of the structures making note of their architectural features.

Some of these buildings have also been mentioned by the Justice E. Padmanabhan committee on hoardings.

Initially, the assessment was restricted to the Chennai Corporation area that has been divided into geographical divisions such as Triplicane, George Town, Purasawalkam and Mylapore.

The State government initiated action in 1997 to conserve heritage buildings. After the second master plan was approved by the government on September 2, 2008, special rules for conservation of heritage buildings/precincts came into force.

With the recommendations of the CMDA, on April 1, 2010, the government constituted the HCC.

Last Updated on Thursday, 14 February 2013 11:03
 


Page 36 of 101